These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18940973)
21. The Supreme Court rules on medical device liability--or does it? Richards EP IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1997; 16(1):87-8, 90. PubMed ID: 9058587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Court backs states on abortion. Marwick C JAMA; 1989 Jul; 262(4):451-2. PubMed ID: 2739042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying. Robichaud TD Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion as a vice crime: a "what if" story. Kaplan J Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(1):151-79. PubMed ID: 11650281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Court decision on medical marijuana use worries patient advocates. Krisberg K Nations Health; 2005 Aug; 35(6):1,14. PubMed ID: 16130240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of Wyeth v. Levine on FDA regulation of prescription drugs. Ausness RC Food Drug Law J; 2010; 65(2):247-83, i-ii. PubMed ID: 24475542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Webster and the politics of abortion. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2703338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The taxing power and the public's health. Mello MM; Cohen IG N Engl J Med; 2012 Nov; 367(19):1777-9. PubMed ID: 23075142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bad medicine: prescription drugs, preemption, and the potential for a no-fault fix. Smirniotopoulos A Rev Law Soc Change; 2012; 35(4):793-862. PubMed ID: 22363960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fraught issue, but narrow ruling in Oregon suicide case. Egan T; Liptak A N Y Times Web; 2006 Jan; ():A16. PubMed ID: 16429627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Good law from tragic facts--Congress, the FDA, and preemption. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2009 Sep; 361(12):1206-11. PubMed ID: 19759383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The perils of relying on interested parties to evaluate scientific quality. Wagner W Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S99-106. PubMed ID: 16030346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Criminal abortion revisited. Buell SW N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1774-831. PubMed ID: 11652642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Who should protect the public? The Supreme Court and medical device regulation. Korobkin R N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(17):1680-1. PubMed ID: 17960010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Prenatal tort law and the personhood of the unborn child: a separate legal existence. Roden GJ St Thomas Law Rev; 2003; 16(1):207-86. PubMed ID: 16211760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical malpractice and tort reform. Berry MD Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2013 Dec; ():1-18. PubMed ID: 24482882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Vaccine liability in the Supreme Court: forging a social compact. Kraemer JD; Gostin LO JAMA; 2011 May; 305(18):1900-1. PubMed ID: 21558521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Medical tort falls short in court. Jones JW; McCullough LB J Vasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 46(6):1303-5. PubMed ID: 18155010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]