These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18941078)

  • 1. CT-based patient-specific modeling of glenoid rim defects: a feasibility study.
    Diederichs G; Seim H; Meyer H; Issever AS; Link TM; Schröder RJ; Scheibel M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1406-11. PubMed ID: 18941078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer assisted reconstruction of complex proximal humerus fractures for preoperative planning.
    Fürnstahl P; Székely G; Gerber C; Hodler J; Snedeker JG; Harders M
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Apr; 16(3):704-20. PubMed ID: 21036097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability.
    Chuang TY; Adams CR; Burkhart SS
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Apr; 24(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 18375267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Glenoid Bone Loss Is Equivalent to 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Quantification: Cadaveric Study.
    Yanke AB; Shin JJ; Pearson I; Bach BR; Romeo AA; Cole BJ; Verma NN
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Apr; 33(4):709-715. PubMed ID: 27923707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective preoperative measurement of anterior glenoid bone loss: a pilot study of a computer-based method using unilateral 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Nofsinger C; Browning B; Burkhart SS; Pedowitz RA
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Mar; 27(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21195579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calculating anterior glenoid bone loss using the Bernageau profile view.
    Murachovsky J; Bueno RS; Nascimento LG; Almeida LH; Strose E; Castiglia MT; de Oliveira HC; Ikemoto RY
    Skeletal Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(10):1231-7. PubMed ID: 22639204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: reliability and accuracy of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional computed tomography measurement techniques.
    Bois AJ; Fening SD; Polster J; Jones MH; Miniaci A
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Nov; 40(11):2569-77. PubMed ID: 23019250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional measurement method of arthritic glenoid cavity morphology: feasibility and reproducibility.
    Moineau G; Levigne C; Boileau P; Young A; Walch G;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 98(6 Suppl):S139-45. PubMed ID: 22964089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.
    Kubicka AM; Stefaniak J; Lubiatowski P; Długosz J; Dzianach M; Redman M; Piontek J; Romanowski L
    Int Orthop; 2016 Dec; 40(12):2581-2588. PubMed ID: 27492723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic extraction of 3D anatomical feature curves of hip bone models reconstructed from CT images.
    Liu H; Qian H; Zhao J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1297-314. PubMed ID: 26405891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery.
    Nguyen D; Ferreira LM; Brownhill JR; Faber KJ; Johnson JA
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 17538787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility of using an inversion-recovery ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequence for quantification of glenoid bone loss.
    Ma YJ; West J; Nazaran A; Cheng X; Hoenecke H; Du J; Chang EY
    Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jul; 47(7):973-980. PubMed ID: 29396694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abdominal pain: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels with 16-section CT--reader lesion detection and interpretation time.
    Jaffe TA; Martin LC; Miller CM; Franklin KM; Merkle EM; Thompson WM; Nelson RC; DeLong DM; Paulson EK
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 17185667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automated estimation of the upper surface of the diaphragm in 3-D CT images.
    Zhou X; Ninomiya H; Hara T; Fujita H; Yokoyama R; Chen H; Kiryu T; Hoshi H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Jan; 55(1):351-3. PubMed ID: 18232381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Global registration of multiple bone fragments using statistical atlas models: feasibility experiments.
    Moghari MH; Abolmaesumi P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():5374-7. PubMed ID: 19163932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated threshold-based 3D segmentation versus short-axis planimetry for assessment of global left ventricular function with dual-source MDCT.
    Juergens KU; Seifarth H; Range F; Wienbeck S; Wenker M; Heindel W; Fischbach R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 18212214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Glenohumeral Anatomic Study. A Comparison of Male and Female Shoulders with Similar Average Age and BMI.
    Jacobson A; Gilot GJ; Hamilton MA; Greene A; Flurin PH; Wright TW; Zuckerman JD; Roche CP
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S68-78. PubMed ID: 26631200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of osteoarticular joint defects through bone segmentation and modeling.
    Yang J; Fu T; Ai D; Xing H; Li Q; Wang Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3471-8. PubMed ID: 25227059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disagreement Between the Accepted Best-Fit Circle Method to Calculate Bone Loss Between Injured and Uninjured Shoulders.
    Do WS; Kim JH; Lim JR; Yoon TH; Chun YM
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Mar; 51(4):885-892. PubMed ID: 36786198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segmentation process significantly influences the accuracy of 3D surface models derived from cone beam computed tomography.
    Fourie Z; Damstra J; Schepers RH; Gerrits PO; Ren Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e524-30. PubMed ID: 21733649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.