159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18941092)
1. Temporal and multiinstitutional quality assessment of CT colonography.
Van Uitert RL; Summers RM; White JM; Deshpande KK; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1503-8. PubMed ID: 18941092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality assessment for CT colonography: validation of automated measurement of colonic distention and residual fluid.
Deshpande KK; Summers RM; Van Uitert RL; Franaszek M; Brown L; Dwyer AJ; Fletcher JG; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1457-63. PubMed ID: 18029885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric analysis of colonic distention according to patient position at CT colonography: diagnostic value of the right lateral decubitus series.
Pickhardt PJ; Bakke J; Kuo J; Robbins JB; Lubner MG; del Rio AM; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):W623-8. PubMed ID: 25415727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon.
Morrin MM; Farrell RJ; Keogan MT; Kruskal JB; Yam CS; Raptopoulos V
Eur Radiol; 2002 Mar; 12(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 11870464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective volumetric comparison of room air versus carbon dioxide for colonic distention at screening CT colonography.
Patrick JL; Bakke JR; Bannas P; Kim DH; Lubner MG; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Feb; 40(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 25081924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography.
Yee J; Kumar NN; Hung RK; Akerkar GA; Kumar PR; Wall SD
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 12601201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT colonography with rectal iodine tagging: Feasibility and comparison with oral tagging in a colorectal cancer screening population.
Neri E; Mantarro A; Faggioni L; Scalise P; Bemi P; Pancrazi F; D'Ippolito G; Bartolozzi C
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1701-7. PubMed ID: 26032131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated carbon dioxide insufflation for CT colonography: effectiveness of colonic distention in cancer patients with severe luminal narrowing.
Kim SY; Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Lee KH; Kim JC; Yu CS; Kim HC; Kim AY; Ha HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Mar; 190(3):698-706. PubMed ID: 18287441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colonic distention at screening CT colonography: role of spasmolytic agents and body habitus.
Sakamoto T; Utsunomiya D; Mitsuzaki K; Matsuda K; Kawakami M; Yamamura S; Urata J; Arakawa A; Yamashita Y
Kurume Med J; 2014; 61(1-2):9-15. PubMed ID: 25400236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colonic distention at CT colonography: randomized evaluation of both IV hyoscine butylbromide and automated carbon dioxide insufflation.
Nagata K; Fujiwara M; Shimamoto T; Iida N; Mogi T; Mitsushima T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 25539240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Iohexol versus diatrizoate for fecal/fluid tagging during CT colonography performed with cathartic preparation: comparison of examination quality.
Kim B; Park SH; Hong GS; Lee JH; Lee JS; Kim HJ; Kim AY; Ha HK
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1561-9. PubMed ID: 25576229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT colonography after incomplete optical colonoscopy: bowel preparation quality at same-day vs. deferred examination.
Theis J; Kim DH; Lubner MG; Muñoz del Rio A; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jan; 41(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 26830606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of colonic distention on superiority of supine versus prone views in screening computed tomographic colonography.
Michel SJ; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Taylor AJ
Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 17825740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
Nagata K; Okawa T; Honma A; Endo S; Kudo SE; Yoshida H
Acad Radiol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):780-9. PubMed ID: 19375954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of degree of colorectal distention with manual air insufflation or automated CO(2) insufflation at CT colonography as a preoperative examination.
Kanazawa H; Utano K; Kijima S; Sasaki T; Miyakura Y; Horie H; Nakamura Y; Sugimoto H
Jpn J Radiol; 2014 May; 32(5):274-81. PubMed ID: 24652001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study.
Dachman AH; Dawson DO; Lefere P; Yoshida H; Khan NU; Cipriani N; Rubin DT
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 16969601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography.
Shinners TJ; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Jones DA; Olsen CH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16714635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography.
Punwani S; Halligan S; Tolan D; Taylor SA; Hawkes D
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):475-81. PubMed ID: 19124562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation.
Burling D; Taylor SA; Halligan S; Gartner L; Paliwalla M; Peiris C; Singh L; Bassett P; Bartram C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 16357385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
