These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18941524)

  • 1. Computing power and sample size for case-control association studies with copy number polymorphism: application of mixture-based likelihood ratio test.
    Kim W; Gordon D; Sebat J; Ye KQ; Finch SJ
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3475. PubMed ID: 18941524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tradeoff between no-call reduction in genotyping error rate and loss of sample size for genetic case/control association studies.
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Brown AM; Ott J; Finch SJ
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2004; ():116-27. PubMed ID: 14992497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical power of association using the extreme discordant phenotype design.
    Zhang G; Nebert DW; Chakraborty R; Jin L
    Pharmacogenet Genomics; 2006 Jun; 16(6):401-13. PubMed ID: 16708049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased power for case-control studies of single nucleotide polymorphisms through incorporation of family history and genetic constraints.
    Thompson D; Witte JS; Slattery M; Goldgar D
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Nov; 27(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 15389928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power evaluation of asymptotic tests for comparing two binomial proportions to detect direct and indirect association in large-scale studies.
    Emily M; Friguet C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2780-2799. PubMed ID: 26468267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.
    Lai R; Zhang H; Yang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 17187401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Generalizing Terwilliger's likelihood approach: a new score statistic to test for genetic association.
    el Galta R; Uitte de Willige S; de Visser MC; Helmer Q; Hsu L; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    BMC Genet; 2007 Sep; 8():63. PubMed ID: 17892585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for genetic association: a powerful score test.
    El Galta R; Stijnen T; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4596-609. PubMed ID: 18551534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A revisit to contingency table and tests of independence: bootstrap is preferred to Chi-square approximations as well as Fisher's exact test.
    Lin JJ; Chang CH; Pal N
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):438-58. PubMed ID: 24905809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new association test based on Chi-square partition for case-control GWA studies.
    Chen Z
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 35(7):658-63. PubMed ID: 22009790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the likelihood ratio tests in bivariate ACDE models.
    Wu H; Neale MC
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):441-63. PubMed ID: 25106394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.
    MacCallum RC; Browne MW; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 16594765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A chi-square goodness-of-fit test for autoregressive logistic regression models with applications to patient screening.
    Hansen AM; Jeske D; Kirsch W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 24854578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A one degree of freedom nominal association model for testing independence in two-way contingency tables.
    Davis CS
    Stat Med; 1991 Oct; 10(10):1555-63. PubMed ID: 1947511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When a case is not a case: effects of phenotype misclassification on power and sample size requirements for the transmission disequilibrium test with affected child trios.
    Buyske S; Yang G; Matise TC; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2009; 67(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 19172087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment on homogeneity tests for kappa statistics under equal prevalence across studies in reliability.
    Nam JM
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1521-31. PubMed ID: 16220477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed-effects model using restricted maximum likelihood.
    Morrell CH
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1560-8. PubMed ID: 9883552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linear trend tests for case-control genetic association that incorporate random phenotype and genotype misclassification error.
    Gordon D; Haynes C; Yang Y; Kramer PL; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 17565750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computing asymptotic power and sample size for case-control genetic association studies in the presence of phenotype and/or genotype misclassification errors.
    Ji F; Yang Y; Haynes C; Finch SJ; Gordon D
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article37. PubMed ID: 16646856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.