180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18941975)
1. Sex-related differences in foot shape.
Krauss I; Grau S; Mauch M; Maiwald C; Horstmann T
Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1693-709. PubMed ID: 18941975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of female foot morphology and last design in athletic footwear--are men's lasts appropriate for women?
Krauss I; Valiant G; Horstmann T; Grau S
Res Sports Med; 2010 Apr; 18(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 20397116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex-related differences in foot shape of adult Caucasians--a follow-up study focusing on long and short feet.
Krauss I; Langbein C; Horstmann T; Grau S
Ergonomics; 2011 Mar; 54(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21390959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new approach to children's footwear based on foot type classification.
Mauch M; Grau S; Krauss I; Maiwald C; Horstmann T
Ergonomics; 2009 Aug; 52(8):999-1008. PubMed ID: 19629814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proper shoe sizes for Thai elderly.
Chaiwanichsiri D; Tantisiriwat N; Janchai S
Foot (Edinb); 2008 Dec; 18(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 20307435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stature and sex estimate using foot and shoe dimensions.
Ozden H; Balci Y; Demirüstü C; Turgut A; Ertugrul M
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):181-4. PubMed ID: 15567624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex differences in relative foot length and perceived attractiveness of female feet: relationships among anthropometry, physique, and preference ratings.
Voracek M; Fisher ML; Rupp B; Lucas D; Fessler DM
Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Jun; 104(3 Pt 2):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17879647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Foot morphology of normal, underweight and overweight children.
Mauch M; Grau S; Krauss I; Maiwald C; Horstmann T
Int J Obes (Lond); 2008 Jul; 32(7):1068-75. PubMed ID: 18414422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. COMPARING 3D FOOT SHAPE MODELS BETWEEN TAIWANESE AND JAPANESE FEMALES.
Lee YC; Kouchi M; Mochimaru M; Wang MJ
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2015 Jun; 44(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 27281917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Foot and shoe size mismatch in three different New York City populations.
Schwarzkopf R; Perretta DJ; Russell TA; Sheskier SC
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2011; 50(4):391-4. PubMed ID: 21616688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gender differences in foot shape: a study of Chinese young adults.
Hong Y; Wang L; Xu DQ; Li JX
Sports Biomech; 2011 Jun; 10(2):85-97. PubMed ID: 21834393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modelling foot height and foot shape-related dimensions.
Xiong S; Goonetilleke RS; Witana CP; Lee Au EY
Ergonomics; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1272-89. PubMed ID: 18608473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The structure of body measurements for the determination of shoe sizing for young Croatian men.
Kalebota N; Szirovicza L; Tucaković-Mujagić L; Drenovac M
Coll Antropol; 2003 Dec; 27(2):635-43. PubMed ID: 14746153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional differences for evaluating the quality of footwear fit.
Witana CP; Feng J; Goonetilleke RS
Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(12):1301-17. PubMed ID: 15370849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do patients with diabetes wear shoes of the correct size?
Harrison SJ; Cochrane L; Abboud RJ; Leese GP
Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Nov; 61(11):1900-4. PubMed ID: 17935549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Taiwanese adult foot shape classification using 3D scanning data.
Lee YC; Wang MJ
Ergonomics; 2015; 58(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 25361465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Foot deformation during walking: differences between static and dynamic 3D foot morphology in developing feet.
Barisch-Fritz B; Schmeltzpfenning T; Plank C; Grau S
Ergonomics; 2014; 57(6):921-33. PubMed ID: 24684680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Foot motion in children shoes: a comparison of barefoot walking with shod walking in conventional and flexible shoes.
Wolf S; Simon J; Patikas D; Schuster W; Armbrust P; Döderlein L
Gait Posture; 2008 Jan; 27(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 17353125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gender differences in adult foot shape: implications for shoe design.
Wunderlich RE; Cavanagh PR
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Apr; 33(4):605-11. PubMed ID: 11283437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes.
Dixon SJ
Ergonomics; 2008 Oct; 51(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 18803091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
