These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18941976)

  • 1. Haptic gas pedal feedback.
    Mulder M; Mulder M; van Paassen MM; Abbink DA
    Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-20. PubMed ID: 18941976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring neuromuscular control dynamics during car following with continuous haptic feedback.
    Abbink DA; Mulder M; van der Helm FC; Mulder M; Boer ER
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2011 Oct; 41(5):1239-49. PubMed ID: 21536522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changing drivers' attitudes towards mobile phone use through participative simulation testing and feedback.
    Wang Y; Zhang W; Lesch MF; Horrey WJ; Chen C; Wu S
    Inj Prev; 2009 Dec; 15(6):384-9. PubMed ID: 19959730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Driving with a Congestion Assistant; mental workload and acceptance.
    Brookhuis KA; van Driel CJ; Hof T; van Arem B; Hoedemaeker M
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Nov; 40(6):1019-25. PubMed ID: 18823875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sharing control with haptics: seamless driver support from manual to automatic control.
    Mulder M; Abbink DA; Boer ER
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):786-98. PubMed ID: 23156623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expectations while car following--the consequences for driving behaviour in a simulated driving task.
    Muhrer E; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):2158-64. PubMed ID: 20728676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why do drivers maintain short headways in fog? A driving-simulator study evaluating feeling of risk and lateral control during automated and manual car following.
    Saffarian M; Happee R; Winter JC
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):971-85. PubMed ID: 22804738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.
    Wang Y; Mehler B; Reimer B; Lammers V; D'Ambrosio LA; Coughlin JF
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 20191415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mitigating driver distraction with retrospective and concurrent feedback.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):776-86. PubMed ID: 18329433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Situation awareness and driving performance in a simulated navigation task.
    Ma R; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1351-64. PubMed ID: 17558674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results.
    de Winter JC; de Groot S; Mulder M; Wieringa PA; Dankelman J; Mulder JA
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):137-53. PubMed ID: 18972239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human-factors engineering for smart transport: design support for car drivers and train traffic controllers.
    Lenior D; Janssen W; Neerincx M; Schreibers K
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Jul; 37(4):479-90. PubMed ID: 16765905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies.
    Melman T; de Winter JC; Abbink DA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan; 98():372-387. PubMed ID: 27865119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simulator to explore the role of haptic feedback in cataract surgery training.
    Doyle L; Gauthier N; Ramanathan S; Okamura A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():106-11. PubMed ID: 18391267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining cognitive interference and adaptive safety behaviours in tactical vehicle control.
    Horrey WJ; Simons DJ
    Ergonomics; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1340-50. PubMed ID: 17558673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of road surface appearance and low friction warning systems on driver behaviour and confidence in the warning system.
    Kircher K; Thorslund B
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 18937091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving.
    Wittmann M; Kiss M; Gugg P; Steffen A; Fink M; Pöppel E; Kamiya H
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Mar; 37(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 16118009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sharing control between humans and automation using haptic interface: primary and secondary task performance benefits.
    Griffiths PG; Gillespie RB
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(3):574-90. PubMed ID: 16435698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responses to deceleration during car following: roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations, and interruptions.
    DeLucia PR; Tharanathan A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):334-50. PubMed ID: 20025419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development and clinical trial of a Driving Simulator for the handicapped.
    Ku J; Jang D; Ahn H; Lee J; Kim JA; Lee B; Kim IY; Kim SI
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():240-6. PubMed ID: 15458094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.