BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18942635)

  • 1. Effectiveness of decentralized community-based screening, detection, and treatment of breast cancer in low-income, uninsured women.
    Bhaskara A; Altamirano M; Trisal V; Paz IB; Lai LL
    Am Surg; 2008 Oct; 74(10):1017-21. PubMed ID: 18942635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of a national program to provide free mammograms to low-income, uninsured women on breast cancer mortality rates.
    Howard DH; Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Tangka FK; Li C; Miller JW
    Cancer; 2010 Oct; 116(19):4456-62. PubMed ID: 20564744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Report from the CDC. Pap test intervals used by physicians serving low-income women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Cooper CP; Saraiya M; McLean TA; Hannan J; Liesmann JM; Rose SW; Lawson HW
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Oct; 14(8):670-8. PubMed ID: 16232098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of a National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on social disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in Massachusetts.
    Liu MJ; Hawk H; Gershman ST; Smith SM; Karacek R; Woodford ML; Ayanian JZ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2005 Feb; 16(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 15750855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comprehensive breast and cervical cancer screening program for medically underserved women in Connecticut.
    McCooey L; Mitchell PP; Parker CB; Simpson J
    Conn Med; 1999 Jan; 63(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 10071434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recruitment of underserved women for breast cancer detection programs.
    Zabora JR; Morrison C; Olsen SJ; Ashley B
    Cancer Pract; 1997; 5(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 9341352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer screening of the medically underserved: results and implications.
    McCoy CB; Smith SA; Metsch LR; Anwyl RS; Correa R; Bankston L; Zavertnik JJ
    Cancer Pract; 1994; 2(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 7858653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of a cancer screening program on breast cancer stage at diagnosis in a medically underserved urban community.
    Oluwole SF; Ali AO; Adu A; Blane BP; Barlow B; Oropeza R; Freeman HP
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Feb; 196(2):180-8. PubMed ID: 12595043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment of elderly breast cancer patients in a community hospital setting.
    Litvak DA; Arora R
    Arch Surg; 2006 Oct; 141(10):985-90; discussion 990. PubMed ID: 17043276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of direct mail as a population-based strategy to increase mammography use among low-income underinsured women ages 40 to 64 years.
    Slater JS; Henly GA; Ha CN; Malone ME; Nyman JA; Diaz S; McGovern PG
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Oct; 14(10):2346-52. PubMed ID: 16214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adherence to cervical and breast cancer programs is crucial to improving screening performance.
    Mauad EC; Nicolau SM; Moreira LF; Haikel RL; Longatto-Filho A; Baracat EC
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1241. PubMed ID: 19778158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geographic clustering of adequate diagnostic follow-up after abnormal screening results for breast cancer among low-income women in Missouri.
    Schootman M; Jeff DB; Gillanders WE; Yan Y; Jenkins B; Aft R
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):704-12. PubMed ID: 17574437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in breast cancer during three decades in Denmark: stage at diagnosis, surgical management and survival.
    Jensen AR; Madsen AH; Overgaard J
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 18465319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening mammography: the Mount Sinai BreastCheck experience.
    Moskowitz H; Kron E; Hall D
    Conn Med; 1993 Dec; 57(12):777-80. PubMed ID: 8149736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment variation by insurance status for breast cancer patients.
    Coburn N; Fulton J; Pearlman DN; Law C; DiPaolo B; Cady B
    Breast J; 2008; 14(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 18315690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A mammogram coupon program: a collaborative effort to provide mammograms to uninsured women in Connecticut.
    Parker CB; Simpson J; McCooey LS
    Conn Med; 1995 Aug; 59(8):451-4. PubMed ID: 7554898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting follow-up among low-income women with breast abnormalities.
    Kaplan CP; Crane LA; Stewart S; Juarez-Reyes M
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Mar; 13(2):195-206. PubMed ID: 15072734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost analysis of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: selected states, 2003 to 2004.
    Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Subramanian S; Tangka FK; Bapat B; Richardson LC
    Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(3):626-35. PubMed ID: 18157831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a community-based intervention to enhance breast cancer screening practices in Brazil.
    Thuler LC; Freitas HG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 14(6):1012-7. PubMed ID: 18759754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.