BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1894316)

  • 1. Cancer registration: principles and methods. Quality and quality control.
    Skeet RG
    IARC Sci Publ; 1991; (95):101-7. PubMed ID: 1894316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cancer registration: principles and methods. Editing for consistency of data items.
    van Holten V
    IARC Sci Publ; 1991; (95):212-9. PubMed ID: 1894323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cancer registration: principles and methods. Items of patient information which may be collected by registries.
    MacLennan R
    IARC Sci Publ; 1991; (95):43-63. PubMed ID: 1894332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cancer registration: principles and methods. Classification and coding of neoplasms.
    Muir CS; Percy C
    IARC Sci Publ; 1991; (95):64-81. PubMed ID: 1894333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.
    Bray F; Parkin DM
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 19117750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Local registration problems in connection with data collection at an emergency department].
    Blohm D; Krum-Møller DS; Hansen TB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Aug; 160(35):5052-4. PubMed ID: 9739609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality control of patient identification in cancer registries].
    Eklund G; Wiklund K
    Lakartidningen; 1979 Oct; 76(41):3532-3. PubMed ID: 522542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer registration data and quality indicators in low and middle income countries: their interpretation and potential use for the improvement of cancer care.
    Curado MP; Voti L; Sortino-Rachou AM
    Cancer Causes Control; 2009 Jul; 20(5):751-6. PubMed ID: 19112603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.
    Parkin DM; Bray F
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 19128954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Data quality of cancer registration by Adicap codes, used by French pathologists from Paca, 2005-2006].
    Bailly L; Mariné-Barjoan E; Ambrosetti D; Roussel JF; Caissotti C; Ettore F; Diebolt E; Grill JM; Sattonnet C; Michiels JF; Pradier C
    Ann Pathol; 2009 Apr; 29(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19364576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Is registration of multiple myeloma in the Norwegian Cancer Registry good enough?].
    Aasbrenn M; Langmark F; Wisløff F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Dec; 128(23):2712-4. PubMed ID: 19079417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. For the patient. Collecting cancer information in New Hampshire.
    Riddle BL
    Ethn Dis; 2005; 15(2):353. PubMed ID: 15825987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Danish Cancer Registry, a self-reporting national cancer registration system with elements of active data collection.
    Storm HH
    IARC Sci Publ; 1991; (95):220-36. PubMed ID: 1894325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of cancer registration in Denmark in 1977. Preliminary evaluation of cancer registration by the Cancer Register and the National Patient Register].
    Osterlind A; Jensen OM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1985 Jul; 147(31):2483-8. PubMed ID: 4060314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A modification to the flow method to estimate completeness in cancer registries with delayed registration.
    Montanaro F; Robinson D; Bordoni A; Lutz JM
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Sep; 28(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 16849689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control of automatically defined cancer cases by the automated registration system of the Venetian Tumour Registry. Quality control of cancer cases automatically registered.
    Tognazzo S; Andolfo A; Bovo E; Fiore AR; Greco A; Guzzinati S; Monetti D; Stocco CF; Zambon P
    Eur J Public Health; 2005 Dec; 15(6):657-64. PubMed ID: 16051658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery.
    Gunnarsson U; Seligsohn E; Jestin P; Påhlman L
    Br J Surg; 2003 Apr; 90(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 12673748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The registrar's registry: an automated tumor registry system.
    Thoman D; Platz K
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):26-34, 36. PubMed ID: 10112268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Registration completeness and tumour-node-metastases category distribution in prostatic and testicular cancer in Bavaria.
    Radespiel-Tröger M; Geiss K; Gärtig-Daugs A; Meyer M
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun; 17(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 18414194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assuring the quality of cancer registration in Rhode Island. Evaluation of early returns indicates future measures for enhancing reliability.
    Fulton JP; Buechner JS; Stanis D; Raimondo M
    R I Med J (1976); 1988 Sep; 71(9):337-46. PubMed ID: 3187325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.