These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18943179)

  • 1. An assessment model for rating high-threat crop pathogens.
    Schaad NW; Abrams J; Madden LV; Frederick RD; Luster DG; Damsteegt VD; Vidaver AK
    Phytopathology; 2006 Jun; 96(6):616-21. PubMed ID: 18943179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The threat of plant pathogens as weapons against U.S. crops.
    Madden LV; Wheelis M
    Annu Rev Phytopathol; 2003; 41():155-76. PubMed ID: 12730385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using an innovative criteria weighting tool for stakeholders involvement to rank MSW facility sites with the AHP.
    De Feo G; De Gisi S
    Waste Manag; 2010 Nov; 30(11):2370-82. PubMed ID: 20444589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advances in molecular-based diagnostics in meeting crop biosecurity and phytosanitary issues.
    Schaad NW; Frederick RD; Shaw J; Schneider WL; Hickson R; Petrillo MD; Luster DG
    Annu Rev Phytopathol; 2003; 41():305-24. PubMed ID: 14527331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-criteria analysis for improving strategic environmental assessment of water programmes. A case study in semi-arid region of Brazil.
    Garfì M; Ferrer-Martí L; Bonoli A; Tondelli S
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):665-75. PubMed ID: 21035244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. WHIPPET: a novel tool for prioritizing invasive plant populations for regional eradication.
    Skurka Darin GM; Schoenig S; Barney JN; Panetta FD; DiTomaso JM
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jan; 92(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 20832930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making.
    Steele K; Carmel Y; Cross J; Wilcox C
    Risk Anal; 2009 Jan; 29(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 18826413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment.
    Ramanathan R
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Sep; 63(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 11591027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The prioritisation of invasive alien plant control projects using a multi-criteria decision model informed by stakeholder input and spatial data.
    Forsyth GG; Le Maitre DC; O'Farrell PJ; van Wilgen BW
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Jul; 103():51-7. PubMed ID: 22459070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selection of infectious medical waste disposal firms by using the analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis.
    Hsu PF; Wu CR; Li YT
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(8):1386-94. PubMed ID: 17689065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
    Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
    Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Program eases decision making.
    Turri JJ
    Health Prog; 1988 Oct; 69(8):40-4. PubMed ID: 10290384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel computer based expert decision making model for prostate cancer disease management.
    Richman MB; Forman EH; Bayazit Y; Einstein DB; Resnick MI; Stovsky MD
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2310-8. PubMed ID: 16280831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A resilience-based approach for comparing expert preferences across two large-scale coastal management programs.
    Ryu J; Leschine TM; Nam J; Chang WK; Dyson K
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jan; 92(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 20828916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.