302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18945357)
21. Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS): development and testing of the instrument.
Orchard CA; King GA; Khalili H; Bezzina MB
J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2012; 32(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 22447712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Factors that can make an impact on decision-making and decision implementation in cancer multidisciplinary teams: an interview study of the provider perspective.
Jalil R; Ahmed M; Green JS; Sevdalis N
Int J Surg; 2013; 11(5):389-94. PubMed ID: 23500030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Developing and testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure), a self-assessment tool to improve cancer multidisciplinary teamwork.
Taylor C; Brown K; Lamb B; Harris J; Sevdalis N; Green JS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 19(13):4019-27. PubMed ID: 22820934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance management in healthcare: performance indicator development, task uncertainty, and types of performance indicators.
van der Geer E; van Tuijl HF; Rutte CG
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Nov; 69(10):1523-30. PubMed ID: 19781838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What perceptions do patients have of decision making (DM)? Toward an integrative patient-centered care model. A qualitative study using focus-group interviews.
Moreau A; Carol L; Dedianne MC; Dupraz C; Perdrix C; Lainé X; Souweine G
Patient Educ Couns; 2012 May; 87(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 21903355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on workflow in radiology and pathology departments.
Kane B; Luz S; O'Briain DS; McDermott R
BMC Med; 2007 Jun; 5():15. PubMed ID: 17567904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27.
Salsbury SA; Vining RD; Gosselin D; Goertz CM
Chiropr Man Therap; 2018; 26():29. PubMed ID: 29977521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. How to manage organisational change and create practice teams: experiences of a South African primary care health centre.
Mash BJ; Mayers P; Conradie H; Orayn A; Kuiper M; Marais J
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2008 Jul; 21(2):132. PubMed ID: 19039745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.
Bowling A; Rowe G; Lambert N; Waddington M; Mahtani KR; Kenten C; Howe A; Francis SA
Health Technol Assess; 2012 Jul; 16(30):i-xii, 1-509. PubMed ID: 22747798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Therapists' experiences and perceptions of teamwork in neurological rehabilitation: reasoning behind the team approach, structure and composition of the team and teamworking processes.
Suddick KM; De Souza L
Physiother Res Int; 2006 Jun; 11(2):72-83. PubMed ID: 16808088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rehabilitation - a new approach. Part three: the implications of the theories.
Wade D
Clin Rehabil; 2016 Jan; 30(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 26659136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The rehabilitation team: staff perceptions of the hospital environment, the interdisciplinary team environment, and interprofessional relations.
Strasser DC; Falconer JA; Martino-Saltzmann D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Feb; 75(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8311674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quality improvement in multidisciplinary cancer teams: an investigation of teamwork and clinical decision-making and cross-validation of assessments.
Lamb BW; Sevdalis N; Mostafid H; Vincent C; Green JS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3535-43. PubMed ID: 21594706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Agreement of functional independence measure item scores in patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another.
Kohler F; Dickson H; Redmond H; Estell J; Connolly C
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Dec; 45(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 20032905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physical therapy practice.
Wedge FM; Braswell-Christy J; Brown CJ; Foley KT; Graham C; Shaw S
Physiother Theory Pract; 2012 Feb; 28(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 21877943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Organization of rehabilitation for people with disabilities as a consequence of neurological conditions in Hungary].
Fazekas G; Dénes Z; Fáy V; Urbán E; Szél I
Ideggyogy Sz; 2011 Jan; 64(1-2):67-70. PubMed ID: 21428042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Teamwork and team success in multi- and interdisciplinary teams in medical rehabilitation].
Körner M; Bengel J
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Dec; 43(6):348-57. PubMed ID: 15565536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A randomized comparison of care provided by a clinical nurse specialist, an inpatient team, and a day patient team in rheumatoid arthritis.
Tijhuis GJ; Zwinderman AH; Hazes JM; Van Den Hout WB; Breedveld FC; Vliet Vlieland TP
Arthritis Rheum; 2002 Oct; 47(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 12382302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An observational study of health professionals' use of evidence to inform the development of clinical management tools.
Hutchinson AM; Johnston L
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2203-11. PubMed ID: 18705739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Measuring complexity in neurological rehabilitation: the Oxford Case Complexity Assessment Measure (OCCAM).
Troigros O; Béjot Y; Rodriguez PM; Shoaib F; Ellis H; Wade D
Clin Rehabil; 2014 May; 28(5):499-507. PubMed ID: 24275452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
