BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18946628)

  • 1. Bone volume fraction explains the variation in strength and stiffness of cancellous bone affected by metastatic cancer and osteoporosis.
    Nazarian A; von Stechow D; Zurakowski D; Müller R; Snyder BD
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2008 Dec; 83(6):368-79. PubMed ID: 18946628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for patient-specific evaluation of vertebral cancellous bone strength: in vitro validation.
    Diamant I; Shahar R; Masharawi Y; Gefen A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Mar; 22(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 17134802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regional variation in vertebral bone morphology and its contribution to vertebral fracture strength.
    Hulme PA; Boyd SK; Ferguson SJ
    Bone; 2007 Dec; 41(6):946-57. PubMed ID: 17913613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of trabecular bone micro-architecture: contribution to the prediction of biomechanical properties and fracture prevalence.
    Majumdar S
    Technol Health Care; 1998 Dec; 6(5-6):321-7. PubMed ID: 10100935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fighting the fracture cascade: evaluation and management of osteoporotic fractures.
    Sack F
    Postgrad Med; 2008 Nov; 120(4):51-7. PubMed ID: 19020365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Whole bone geometry and bone quality in distal forearm fracture.
    Parkinson IH; Fazzalari NL
    J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Sep; 22(8 Suppl):S59-65. PubMed ID: 18753891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone tissue stiffness in the mandibular condyle is dependent on the direction and density of the cancellous structure.
    van Eijden TM; van Ruijven LJ; Giesen EB
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Dec; 75(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 15654494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of bone size, not density, on the stiffness of the proximal part of normal and osteoporotic human femora.
    Cordey J; Schneider M; Belendez C; Ziegler WJ; Rahn BA; Perren SM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Dec; 7 Suppl 2():S437-44. PubMed ID: 1485554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fabric-mechanical property relationships of trabecular bone allografts are altered by supercritical CO₂ treatment and gamma sterilization.
    Schwiedrzik JJ; Kaudela KH; Burner U; Zysset PK
    Bone; 2011 Jun; 48(6):1370-7. PubMed ID: 21453802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advances in osteoporosis imaging.
    Bauer JS; Link TM
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):440-9. PubMed ID: 19651482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of bone volume fraction and architecture on computed large-deformation failure mechanisms in human trabecular bone.
    Bevill G; Eswaran SK; Gupta A; Papadopoulos P; Keaveny TM
    Bone; 2006 Dec; 39(6):1218-25. PubMed ID: 16904959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-level mechanical signals and their potential as a non-pharmacological intervention for osteoporosis.
    Rubin C; Judex S; Qin YX
    Age Ageing; 2006 Sep; 35 Suppl 2():ii32-ii36. PubMed ID: 16926201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis.
    Li B; Aspden RM
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Apr; 12(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 9101376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation of the mechanical properties of PMMA to suit osteoporotic cancellous bone.
    Boger A; Bisig A; Bohner M; Heini P; Schneider E
    J Biomater Sci Polym Ed; 2008; 19(9):1125-42. PubMed ID: 18727856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone mass, size and previous fractures as predictors of prospective fractures in an osteoporotic referral population.
    Eklund F; Nordström A; Björnstig U; Nordström P
    Bone; 2009 Oct; 45(4):808-13. PubMed ID: 19573633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical analysis of bone and its microarchitecture based on in vivo voxel images.
    Ulrich D; Rietbergen B; Laib A; Rüegsegger P
    Technol Health Care; 1998 Dec; 6(5-6):421-7. PubMed ID: 10100944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The fracture toughness of cancellous bone.
    Cook RB; Zioupos P
    J Biomech; 2009 Sep; 42(13):2054-60. PubMed ID: 19643417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interaction of microstructure and volume fraction in predicting failure in cancellous bone.
    Nazarian A; Stauber M; Zurakowski D; Snyder BD; Müller R
    Bone; 2006 Dec; 39(6):1196-202. PubMed ID: 16920051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone tissue compositional differences in women with and without osteoporotic fracture.
    McCreadie BR; Morris MD; Chen TC; Sudhaker Rao D; Finney WF; Widjaja E; Goldstein SA
    Bone; 2006 Dec; 39(6):1190-5. PubMed ID: 16901772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vertebral fractures are associated with increased cortical porosity in iliac crest bone biopsy of men with idiopathic osteoporosis.
    Ostertag A; Cohen-Solal M; Audran M; Legrand E; Marty C; Chappard D; de Vernejoul MC
    Bone; 2009 Mar; 44(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 19071239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.