BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18946956)

  • 41. RETIRED: Mid-trimester amniocentesis fetal loss rate.
    Wilson RD; Langlois S; Johnson JA; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2007 Jul; 29(7):586-590. PubMed ID: 17623573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Amniotic fluid analysis in the 2d pregnancy trimester].
    Treffers PE; Leschot NJ; Verjaal M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1981 Mar; 125(13):489-93. PubMed ID: 7231574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Fetomaternal transfusions in early pregnancy].
    du Bois A; Rasenack R; Siebers JW; Geyer H; Quaas L
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1991; 195(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 1716034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mid-pregnancy amniocentesis.
    Ju KS; Lee SK; Kim SB; Lee JH
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Mar; 11(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 3893404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Wapner RJ; Evans MI; Platt LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):780; author reply 780-1. PubMed ID: 17329536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Wilson RD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):451-2; author reply 452-3. PubMed ID: 17267851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Smith L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):452; author reply 452-3. PubMed ID: 17267853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Nadel A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Feb; 109(2 Pt 1):451; author reply 452-3. PubMed ID: 17267852
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Consensus Conference on Anti-D Prophylaxis. Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 8-9 April 1997. Papers and abstracts.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Nov; 105 Suppl 18():iv, 1-44. PubMed ID: 10328662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Is it advisable to produce anti-Rh0(D) immunoglobulin for the prevention of hemolytic disease of the newborn? (apropos the article by A. A. Mikhaĭlova and N. Ia. Klimova)].
    Olovnikova NI; Chertkov IL
    Gematol Transfuziol; 1993 Mar; 38(3):38-40. PubMed ID: 8020736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Rhesus immunoprevention by means of immunoglobulin anti-D].
    Maas DH; Schneider
    Med Monatsschr; 1975 Aug; 29(8):340-7. PubMed ID: 813106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Case Report: First Case of Cefotaxime-Sulbactam-Induced Acute Intravascular Hemolysis in a Newborn With ABO Blood Type Incompatibility by the Mechanism of Non-Immunologic Protein Adsorption.
    Wu Y; Wu Y; Yang Y; Chen B; Li J; Guo G; Xiong F
    Front Immunol; 2021; 12():698541. PubMed ID: 35003054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Constriction of the umbilical cord as a cause of fetal demise following midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Robertson RD; Rubinstein LM; Wolfson WL; Lebherz TB; Blanchard JB; Crandall BF
    J Reprod Med; 1981 Jun; 26(6):325-7. PubMed ID: 7252953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Nicolaides K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Mar; 109(3):780; author reply 780-1. PubMed ID: 17329535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Consequences for fetus and neonate of maternal red cell allo-immunisation.
    Howard H; Martlew V; McFadyen I; Clarke C; Duguid J; Bromilow I; Eggington J
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 1998 Jan; 78(1):F62-6. PubMed ID: 9536844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reproductive outcome following amniocentesis for genetic indications.
    Porreco RP; Young PE; Resnik R; Cousins L; Jones OW; Richards T; Kernahan C; Matson M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 143(6):653-60. PubMed ID: 7091237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Risk factors for RhD immunisation despite antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis.
    Koelewijn JM; de Haas M; Vrijkotte TG; van der Schoot CE; Bonsel GJ
    BJOG; 2009 Sep; 116(10):1307-14. PubMed ID: 19538414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The physician as a risk factor in midtrimester amniocentesis.
    Hecht F
    N Engl J Med; 1982 Jun; 306(25):1553. PubMed ID: 7078619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Unexpected suppression of anti-Fya and prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn after administration of Rh immune globulin.
    Branch DR; Scofield TL; Moulds JJ; Swanson JL
    Transfusion; 2011 Apr; 51(4):816-9. PubMed ID: 20946183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Haemolytic disease of the newborn.
    Whitfield CR; Lee D
    BMJ; 1990 Mar; 300(6727):814. PubMed ID: 2157515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.