These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18946977)

  • 1. The effect of the different uncertainty models in dose expected volume histogram computation.
    Cutanda Henríquez F; Vargas Castrillón S
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Sep; 31(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 18946977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confidence intervals in dose volume histogram computation.
    Cutanda Henríquez F; Vargas Castrillón S
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1545-53. PubMed ID: 20443475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo study of the impact of the choice of rectum volume definition on estimates of equivalent uniform doses and the volume parameter.
    Kvinnsland Y; Muren LP; Dahl O
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(15):3341-52. PubMed ID: 15379017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose-volume population histogram: a new tool for evaluating plans whilst considering geometrical uncertainties.
    Nguyen TB; Hoole AC; Burnet NG; Thomas SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):935-47. PubMed ID: 19147901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: the sensitivity of plan objectives and constraints to set-up uncertainty.
    Ploquin N; Song W; Lau H; Dunscombe P
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3515-33. PubMed ID: 16030380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing the sensitivity of IMPT treatment plans to setup errors and range uncertainties via probabilistic treatment planning.
    Unkelbach J; Bortfeld T; Martin BC; Soukup M
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):149-63. PubMed ID: 19235384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose volume histogram comparison between ADAC Pinnacle and Nomos Corvus systems for IMRT.
    Ayyangar KM; Fung AY; Li S; Pillai S; Yoe-Sein MM; Zhen W; Enke CA
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Mar; 28(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 15920983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Treatment simulation approaches for the estimation of the distributions of treatment quality parameters generated by geometrical uncertainties.
    Baum C; Alber M; Birkner M; Nüsslin F
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(24):5475-88. PubMed ID: 15724537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties.
    Cranmer-Sargison G; Zavgorodni S
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16177533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of rectal dose histograms in prostate brachytherapy: some analytic and numerical results.
    Song JS; Albert M; D'Amico AV; Cormack RA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):437-47. PubMed ID: 15789590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MCNP-based computational model for the Leksell gamma knife.
    Trnka J; Novotny J; Kluson J
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 17278491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comment on "Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation" [Med. Phys. 33, 4130-4148 (2006)].
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3414. PubMed ID: 17879803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect.
    Song W; Battista J; Van Dyk J
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3034-45. PubMed ID: 15587657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absolute and relative dose-surface and dose-volume histograms of the bladder: which one is the most representative for the actual treatment?
    Hoogeman MS; Peeters ST; de Bois J; Lebesque JV
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3589-97. PubMed ID: 16030384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of patient inhomogeneities in oesophageal 192Ir HDR brachytherapy: a Monte Carlo and analytical dosimetry study.
    Anagnostopoulos G; Baltas D; Pantelis E; Papagiannis P; Sakelliou L
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(12):2675-85. PubMed ID: 15272681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
    Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation studies of field shaping in rotational radiation therapy.
    Ivanova T; Bliznakova K; Pallikarakis N
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4289-98. PubMed ID: 17153407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of DVH parameter changes due to setup errors for breast cancer treatment based on 2D portal dosimetry.
    Nijsten SM; van Elmpt WJ; Mijnheer BJ; Minken AW; Persoon LC; Lambin P; Dekker AL
    Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 19235376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A robust approach to IMRT optimization.
    Chan TC; Bortfeld T; Tsitsiklis JN
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2567-83. PubMed ID: 16675870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.