238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18947289)
1. Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro.
Bishara SE; Ostby AW; Laffoon J; Warren JJ
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1078-83. PubMed ID: 18947289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Debonding characteristics of a polymer mesh base ceramic bracket bonded with two different conditioning methods.
Elekdag-Turk S; Isci D; Ozkalayci N; Turk T
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 19164413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bond strengths and debonding characteristics of two types of polycrystalline ceramic brackets.
Lemke K; Xu X; Hagan JL; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 21175022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Diode Laser Debonding of Ceramic Brackets on Enamel Surface and Pulpal Temperature.
Yassaei S; Soleimanian A; Nik ZE
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Apr; 16(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 26067728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Debonding forces applied to ceramic brackets simulating clinical conditions.
Bishara SE; Forrseca JM; Fehr DE; Boyer DB
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 7978522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of flowable composites for orthodontic bracket bonding.
Ryou DB; Park HS; Kim KH; Kwon TY
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1105-9. PubMed ID: 18947267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Failure analysis: enamel fracture after debonding orthodontic brackets.
Chen CS; Hsu ML; Chang KD; Kuang SH; Chen PT; Gung YW
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 18947273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enamel loss following ceramic bracket debonding: A quantitative analysis in vitro.
Suliman SN; Trojan TM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):651-6. PubMed ID: 25264580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
Theodorakopoulou LP; Sadowsky PL; Jacobson A; Lacefield W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 15014410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket.
Liu JK; Chung CH; Chang CY; Shieh DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):761-5; quiz 802. PubMed ID: 16360918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks.
Bishara SE; Fonseca JM; Boyer DB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7661139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an ex vivo study.
Kearns HP; Sandham JA; Bryan Jones W; Lagerström L
Br J Orthod; 1997 Aug; 24(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9313918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups.
Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of debonding characteristics of metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel: an in-vitro study.
Habibi M; Nik TH; Hooshmand T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):675-9. PubMed ID: 18005843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Enamel cracks: influence of orthodontic process].
Bernard-Granger C; Gebeile-Chauty S
Orthod Fr; 2014 Sep; 85(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 25158747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
