These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18947289)

  • 21. The effects of bracket removal on enamel.
    Heravi F; Rashed R; Raziee L
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19113075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review.
    Azzeh E; Feldon PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 12532067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Er:YAG Laser for Metal and Ceramic Bracket Debonding: An In Vitro Study on Intrapulpal Temperature, SEM, and EDS Analysis.
    Grzech-Leśniak K; Matys J; Żmuda-Stawowiak D; Mroczka K; Dominiak M; Brugnera Junior A; Gruber R; Romanos GE; Sculean A
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Nov; 36(11):595-600. PubMed ID: 29905504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Thermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.
    Crooks M; Hood J; Harkness M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Feb; 111(2):163-72. PubMed ID: 9057616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ceramic bracket debonding: the evaluation of two debonding techniques and their effect on enamel.
    Amditis C
    Aust Orthod J; 1994 Mar; 13(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 7993241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new premixed self-etch adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Otsby AW; Ajlouni R; Laffoon J; Warren JJ
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1101-4. PubMed ID: 18947293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Methods of debonding ceramic brackets.
    Winchester L
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 19(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 1390580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to enamel with amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite.
    Uysal T; Ustdal A; Nur M; Catalbas B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 20080960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laboratory evaluations on thermal debonding of ceramic brackets.
    Sernetz F; Kraut J
    J Clin Dent; 1991; 2(4):87-91. PubMed ID: 1812904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.
    Abu Alhaija ES; Abu AlReesh IA; AlWahadni AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 19903729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study of the debonding strengths of different ceramic brackets, enamel conditioners, and adhesives.
    Bishara SE; Fehr DE; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 8338070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
    Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of the precrack preparation with an ultrasonic instrument on the ceramic bracket removal.
    Chen YL; Chen HY; Chiang YC; Chang HH; Lin CP
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2015 Aug; 114(8):704-9. PubMed ID: 23856344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets. An in vitro study.
    Brouns EM; Schopf PM; Kocjancic B
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Apr; 15(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 8500537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shear bond strength of a mechanically retained ceramic bracket.
    Carty G; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1993 Oct; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 16429853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does ultra-pulse CO(2) laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets?
    Ahrari F; Heravi F; Fekrazad R; Farzanegan F; Nakhaei S
    Lasers Med Sci; 2012 May; 27(3):567-74. PubMed ID: 21667137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trouble-free debonding in orthodontics: 2.
    Turner PJ
    Dent Update; 1996 Dec; 23(10):426-9. PubMed ID: 9610275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laser debonding of ceramic orthodontic brackets.
    Tocchio RM; Williams PT; Mayer FJ; Standing KG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Feb; 103(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 8427220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.
    Arici S; Minors C
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 10920565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.