These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1894745)

  • 21. Important differences in clinical data from third, second, and first generation periodontal probes.
    Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Johnson NW
    J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 9150038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of probes for microbial contamination following use in periodontal pockets of various depths.
    Holt LA; Williams KB; Cobb CM; Keselyak NT; Jamison CL; Brand VS
    J Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 75(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 15088872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes.
    Karpinia K; Magnusson I; Gibbs C; Yang MC
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15016020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measuring clinical attachment: reproducibility of relative measurements with an electronic probe.
    Clark WB; Yang MC; Magnusson I
    J Periodontol; 1992 Oct; 63(10):831-8. PubMed ID: 1403590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Histological location of a standardized periodontal probe in man.
    Aguero A; Garnick JJ; Keagle J; Steflik DE; Thompson WO
    J Periodontol; 1995 Mar; 66(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 7776162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.
    Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Periodontal probing systems: a review of available equipment.
    Ramachandra SS; Mehta DS; Sandesh N; Baliga V; Amarnath J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Mar; 32(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 21473303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A thin or thick probe handle: does it make a difference?
    van Weringh M; Barendregt DS; Rosema NA; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2006 Aug; 4(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 16958742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Description and clinical evaluation of a new computerized periodontal probe--the Florida probe.
    Gibbs CH; Hirschfeld JW; Lee JG; Low SB; Magnusson I; Thousand RR; Yerneni P; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1988 Feb; 15(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 3162246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements.
    Yang MC; Marks RG; Magnusson I; Clouser B; Clark WB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):541-8. PubMed ID: 1447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of a new periodontal probe tip design. A clinical and in vitro study.
    Vartoukian SR; Palmer RM; Wilson RF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):918-25. PubMed ID: 15367198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reproducibility of probing depth measurement by an experimental periodontal probe incorporating optical fiber sensor.
    Ishihata K; Wakabayashi N; Wadachi J; Akizuki T; Izumi Y; Takakuda K; Igarashi Y
    J Periodontol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 21574830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A periodontal probe with automated cemento--enamel junction detection-design and clinical trials.
    Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Captain K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 1855793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Technological advances in the clinical diagnosis of periodontal diseases.
    Dreyer WP
    Int Dent J; 1993 Dec; 43(6):557-66. PubMed ID: 8138315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new periodontal probe with automated cemento-enamel junction detection.
    Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Jens SC; Captain K
    J Clin Periodontol; 1986 Apr; 13(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 3458724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improved diagnostics: clinical evaluation of a color-coded, polymeric periodontal probe.
    Kazmierczak MD; Ciancio SG; Mather M; Dangler LV; Troullos ES
    Clin Prev Dent; 1992; 14(4):24-8. PubMed ID: 1521399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter- and intra-examiner variability using standard and constant force periodontal probes.
    Walsh TF; Saxby MS
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Mar; 16(3):140-3. PubMed ID: 2723096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The location of the periodontal probe tip in health and disease.
    Hancock EB; Wirthlin MR
    J Periodontol; 1981 Mar; 52(3):124-9. PubMed ID: 6939832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Constant force probing with and without a stent in untreated periodontal disease: the clinical reproducibility problem and possible sources of error.
    Watts T
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Aug; 14(7):407-11. PubMed ID: 3476518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gingival resistance to probing forces. I. Determination of optimal probe diameter.
    Keagle JG; Garnick JJ; Searle JR; King GE; Morse PK
    J Periodontol; 1989 Apr; 60(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 2724029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.