1252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18947461)
1. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience.
Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Modica G; Sciumè C
G Chir; 2008 Oct; 29(10):403-6. PubMed ID: 18947461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endobiliary brush cytology during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in patients with obstructive jaundice.
Xing GS; Geng JC; Han XW; Dai JH; Wu CY
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2005 Feb; 4(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15730930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective study of biliary cytology in 100 patients with bile duct strictures.
Kurzawinski TR; Deery A; Dooley JS; Dick R; Hobbs KE; Davidson BR
Hepatology; 1993 Dec; 18(6):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8244264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP.
Park MS; Kim TK; Kim KW; Park SW; Lee JK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Kim KA; Kim AY; Kim PN; Lee MG; Ha HK
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):234-40. PubMed ID: 15333766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytological sampling versus forceps biopsy during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and analysis of factors predicting success.
Tapping CR; Byass OR; Cast JE
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Aug; 35(4):883-9. PubMed ID: 21647806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Brush cytology during ERCP for the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic malignancies.
Ferrari Júnior AP; Lichtenstein DR; Slivka A; Chang C; Carr-Locke DL
Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(2 Pt 1):140-5. PubMed ID: 8013810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monocentric study of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 239 patients with symptomatic biliary stricture.
Fior-Gozlan M; Giovannini D; Rabeyrin M; Mc Leer-Florin A; Laverrière MH; Bichard P
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):330-9. PubMed ID: 26700399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of exfoliative cytology for investigating bile duct strictures.
Davidson B; Varsamidakis N; Dooley J; Deery A; Dick R; Kurzawinski T; Hobbs K
Gut; 1992 Oct; 33(10):1408-11. PubMed ID: 1446870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Triple-tissue sampling during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography increases the overall diagnostic sensitivity for cholangiocarcinoma.
Lee SJ; Lee YS; Lee MG; Lee SH; Shin E; Hwang JH
Gut Liver; 2014 Nov; 8(6):669-73. PubMed ID: 25368755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The usefulness of adding p53 immunocytochemistry to bile drainage cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.
Yeo MK; Kim KH; Lee YM; Lee BS; Choi SY
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Jul; 45(7):592-597. PubMed ID: 28411396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.
Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H
Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Glasbrenner B; Ardan M; Boeck W; Preclik G; Möller P; Adler G
Endoscopy; 1999 Nov; 31(9):712-7. PubMed ID: 10604612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors for detection of cancer in patients with indeterminate biliary stricture and atypical cells on endoscopic retrograde brush cytology.
Navaneethan U; Singh T; Gutierrez NG; Jegadeesan R; Venkatesh PG; Brainard J; Vargo JJ; Parsi MA
J Dig Dis; 2014 May; 15(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 24612456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results.
DeWitt J; Misra VL; Leblanc JK; McHenry L; Sherman S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Sep; 64(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 16923477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of novel slim biopsy forceps for diagnosis of biliary strictures: Single-institutional study of consecutive 360 cases (with video).
Yamamoto K; Tsuchiya T; Itoi T; Tsuji S; Tanaka R; Tonozuka R; Honjo M; Mukai S; Kamada K; Fujita M; Asai Y; Matsunami Y; Nagakawa Y; Yamaguchi H; Sofuni A
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Sep; 23(35):6429-6436. PubMed ID: 29085192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transpapillary biliary biopsy for malignant biliary strictures: comparison between cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer.
Chen WM; Wei KL; Chen YS; Chang PJ; Tung SY; Chang TS; Huang HC; Shen CH; Hsieh YY; Wu CS
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 14():140. PubMed ID: 27142076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How many cytological examinations should be performed for the diagnosis of malignant biliary stricture via an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube?
Uchida N; Kamada H; Ono M; Aritomo Y; Masaki T; Nakatsu T; Kuriyama S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1501-4. PubMed ID: 18028351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined brush cytology and stent placement in a single session for presumed malignant biliary stricture.
Kawada N; Uehara H; Katayama K; Takano Y; Takakura R; Imanaka K; Ohkawa K; Takenaka A; Ishikawa O
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Aug; 26(8):1247-51. PubMed ID: 21443662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the pathological diagnosis of suspected malignant bile duct strictures.
Chang HY; Liu B; Wang YZ; Wang WJ; Wang W; Li D; Li YL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(11):e19545. PubMed ID: 32176109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
