121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18947638)
1. The minimally invasive open pyeloplasty.
Chacko JK; Koyle MA; Mingin GC; Furness PD
J Pediatr Urol; 2006 Aug; 2(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 18947638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive open renal surgery.
Chacko JK; Koyle MA; Mingin GC; Furness PD
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1575-7; discussion 1577-8. PubMed ID: 17707048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Miniature pyeloplasty as a minimally invasive surgery with less than 1 day admission in infants.
Kajbafzadeh AM; Tourchi A; Nezami BG; Khakpour M; Mousavian AA; Talab SS
J Pediatr Urol; 2011 Jun; 7(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 21527237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Zhang X; Li HZ; Ma X; Zheng T; Lang B; Zhang J; Fu B; Xu K; Guo XL
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1077-80. PubMed ID: 16890694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: intermediate results.
Tong Q; Zheng L; Tang S; Zeng F; Du Z; Mei H; Wu Z; Pu J; Ruan Q
Urology; 2009 Oct; 74(4):889-93. PubMed ID: 19628268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery.
Piaggio LA; Franc-Guimond J; Noh PH; Wehry M; Figueroa TE; Barthold J; González R
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1579-83. PubMed ID: 17707047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retroperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experiences.
Cutting C; Borup K; Barber N; Choi W; Poulsen EU; Poulsen J
Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1166-70. PubMed ID: 16984546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: long-term outcome.
Ansari MS; Mandhani A; Singh P; Srivastava A; Kumar A; Kapoor R
Int J Urol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):881-4. PubMed ID: 18775033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retroperitoneoscopic vs open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Valla JS; Breaud J; Griffin SJ; Sautot-Vial N; Beretta F; Guana R; Gelas T; Carpentier X; Leculee R; Steyaert H
J Pediatr Urol; 2009 Oct; 5(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 19369118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison between laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Simforoosh N; Basiri A; Tabibi A; Danesh AK; Sharifi-Aghdas F; Ziaee SA; Nooralizadeh A; Hosseini-Moghaddam SM
Urol J; 2004; 1(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 17914681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Kojima Y; Sasaki S; Mizuno K; Tozawa K; Hayashi Y; Kohri K
Int J Urol; 2009 May; 16(5):472-6. PubMed ID: 19383038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is one-day hospitalization after open pyeloplasty possible and safe?
Piedrahita YK; Palmer JS
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):181-4. PubMed ID: 16413360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (report of 150 cases).
Chuanyu S; Guowei X; Ke X; Qiang D; Yuanfang Z
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1036-40. PubMed ID: 19660798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Bägli DJ; Keays M; Farhat WA; Khoury AE; Salle JL
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1684-7; discussion 1687-8. PubMed ID: 18708226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of open vs laparoscopic pediatric pyeloplasty using the pediatric health information system database--do benefits of laparoscopic approach recede at younger ages?
Tanaka ST; Grantham JA; Thomas JC; Adams MC; Brock JW; Pope JC
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1479-85. PubMed ID: 18710777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contemporary open ureteral reimplantation without morphine: assessment of pain and outcomes.
Chamie K; Chi A; Hu B; Keegan KA; Kurzrock EA
J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):1147-51. PubMed ID: 19625056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a Pediatric Health Information System database study.
Vemulakonda VM; Cowan CA; Lendvay TS; Joyner BD; Grady RW
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1689-92; discussion 1692. PubMed ID: 18708209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Farhat WA; Bägli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1693-8; discussion1698-9. PubMed ID: 18708220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
