These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18947829)

  • 1. Predictive modelling of cervical disc implant wear.
    de Jongh CU; Basson AH; Scheffer C
    J Biomech; 2008 Nov; 41(15):3177-83. PubMed ID: 18947829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
    Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element application in implant research for treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.
    Zhang QH; Teo EC
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Dec; 30(10):1246-56. PubMed ID: 18804398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical spine biomechanics following implantation of a disc prosthesis.
    Galbusera F; Bellini CM; Raimondi MT; Fornari M; Assietti R
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Nov; 30(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 18359659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of cervical spine biomechanics after fixed- and mobile-core artificial disc replacement: a finite element analysis.
    Lee SH; Im YJ; Kim KT; Kim YH; Park WM; Kim K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 21245792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface slide track mapping of implants for total disc arthroplasty.
    Paré PE; Chan FW; Bhattacharya S; Goel VK
    J Biomech; 2009 Jan; 42(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 19135202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intervertebral disc biomechanical analysis using the finite element modeling based on medical images.
    Li H; Wang Z
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2006; 30(6-7):363-70. PubMed ID: 17074465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical studies on cervical total disc arthroplasty: a literature review.
    Galbusera F; Bellini CM; Brayda-Bruno M; Fornari M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1095-104. PubMed ID: 18635294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A biomechanical study of artificial cervical discs using computer simulation.
    Ahn HS; DiAngelo DJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(8):883-92. PubMed ID: 18404108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.
    Anderson PA; Rouleau JP; Bryan VE; Carlson CS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S186-94. PubMed ID: 14560190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of an interspinous implant on loads in the lumbar spine.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Burra NK; Bergmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Oct; 50(10):343-7. PubMed ID: 16300050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-dimensional surrogate contact modeling for computationally efficient dynamic simulation of total knee replacements.
    Lin YC; Haftka RT; Queipo NV; Fregly BJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041010. PubMed ID: 19275439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the finite element method to study the mechanism of spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in the cervical spine.
    Imajo Y; Hiiragi I; Kato Y; Taguchi T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):E83-7. PubMed ID: 19139658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cervical disk implants and cervical disk fusion treatments in human cadaveric models.
    Davies MA; Bryant SC; Larsen SP; Murrey DB; Nussman DS; Laxer EB; Darden BV
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 16813439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.