These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18948430)

  • 41. Violent sex offenses: how are they best measured from official records?
    Rice ME; Harris GT; Lang C; Cormier C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):525-41. PubMed ID: 16770703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Long-Term Predictive Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II: Research and Practice Implications.
    Schwartz-Mette RA; Righthand S; Hecker J; Dore G; Huff R
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Aug; 32(5):499-520. PubMed ID: 30714853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Female Juvenile Sexual Offenders: Understanding Who They Are and Possible Steps That May Prevent Some Girls From Offending.
    Oliver BE; Holmes L
    J Child Sex Abus; 2015; 24(6):698-715. PubMed ID: 26340075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Validity and Reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Sexual Offense Version.
    Rojas EY; Olver ME
    Sex Abuse; 2020 Oct; 32(7):826-849. PubMed ID: 31248327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The relationship between life satisfaction, risk-taking behaviors, and youth violence.
    MacDonald JM; Piquero AR; Valois RF; Zullig KJ
    J Interpers Violence; 2005 Nov; 20(11):1495-518. PubMed ID: 16210738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Female and male sex offenders: a comparison of recidivism patterns and risk factors.
    Freeman NJ; Sandler JC
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1394-413. PubMed ID: 18349348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Juvenile sex offenders compared to non-sex offenders: a review of the literature 1995-2005.
    van Wijk A; Vermeiren R; Loeber R; 't Hart-Kerkhoffs L; Doreleijers T; Bullens R
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2006 Oct; 7(4):227-43. PubMed ID: 17065545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors.
    Mann RE; Hanson RK; Thornton D
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Jun; 22(2):191-217. PubMed ID: 20363981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sex offender care for adolescents in secure care: critical factors and counseling strategies.
    Underwood LA; Robinson SB; Mosholder E; Warren KM
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2008 Jul; 28(6):917-32. PubMed ID: 18313820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: a meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies.
    Hanson RK; Morton-Bourgon KE
    Psychol Assess; 2009 Mar; 21(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 19290762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Characteristics of homicidal and violent juveniles.
    Shumaker DM; McKee GR
    Violence Vict; 2001 Aug; 16(4):401-9. PubMed ID: 11506449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Sex offender registration and notification policy increases juvenile plea bargains.
    Letourneau EJ; Armstrong KS; Bandyopadhyay D; Sinha D
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Apr; 25(2):189-207. PubMed ID: 22915204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth.
    Barra S; Bessler C; Landolt MA; Aebi M
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Nov; 30(11):1430-1443. PubMed ID: 29792506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P; Babchishin K; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Juvenile offender recidivism: an examination of risk factors.
    Calley NG
    J Child Sex Abus; 2012; 21(3):257-72. PubMed ID: 22574843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Juvenile group sex offenders: a comparison of group leaders and followers.
    't Hart-Kerkhoffs LA; Vermeiren RR; Jansen LM; Doreleijers TA
    J Interpers Violence; 2011 Jan; 26(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 20442449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales.
    Craig LA; Beech A; Browne KD
    J Interpers Violence; 2006 May; 21(5):612-33. PubMed ID: 16574636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Adolescent sexual offenders: the relationship between typology and recidivism.
    Chu CM; Thomas SD
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Jun; 22(2):218-33. PubMed ID: 20458125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Juvenile sex offenders: a complex population.
    Andrade JT; Vincent GM; Saleh FM
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 16423244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Protective factors in male adolescents with a history of sexual and/or violent offending: a comparison between three subgroups.
    van der Put CE; Asscher JJ
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):109-26. PubMed ID: 25186865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.