These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18948801)

  • 1. Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancer.
    Larson DW; Marcello PW; Larach SW; Wexner SD; Park A; Marks J; Senagore AJ; Thorson AG; Young-Fadok TM; Green E; Sargent DJ; Nelson H
    Ann Surg; 2008 Nov; 248(5):746-50. PubMed ID: 18948801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgeon-Level Variation in Postoperative Complications.
    Xu T; Makary MA; Al Kazzi E; Zhou M; Pawlik TM; Hutfless SM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Jul; 20(7):1393-9. PubMed ID: 27120446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elective resection of colon cancer by high-volume surgeons is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality.
    Drolet S; MacLean AR; Myers RP; Shaheen AA; Dixon E; Buie WD
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Apr; 15(4):541-50. PubMed ID: 21279550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection.
    Harmon JW; Tang DG; Gordon TA; Bowman HM; Choti MA; Kaufman HS; Bender JS; Duncan MD; Magnuson TH; Lillemoe KD; Cameron JL
    Ann Surg; 1999 Sep; 230(3):404-11; discussion 411-3. PubMed ID: 10493487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic Colectomy and the General Surgeon.
    Moore J; Pellet A; Hyman N
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Mar; 20(3):640-3. PubMed ID: 26385005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standardization of Colon Resection for Cancer: An Overview of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Standard 5.6.
    Thomas KK; Francescatti AB; Vreeland TJ; Teshome MK; Morris AM; Hunt KK; Katz MHG; Villano AM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jan; 31(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 37880516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robots in surgery: advanced gastrointestinal applications and credentialing.
    Melvin WS
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2003; 7(4):481-483. PubMed ID: 12763404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training and Credentialing in Laparoscopic Surgery - The Need of the Day.
    Singh Y
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2005 Jan; 61(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 27407694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical technique and surgeon volume: the pursuit of data-driven outcomes.
    Ramirez PT; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 35725030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commentary: Surgical leaders must be respected technical surgeon to effectively lead.
    Cerfolio RJ
    JTCVS Tech; 2021 Dec; 10():575-576. PubMed ID: 34977812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review.
    Bayat Z; Guidolin K; Elsolh B; De Castro C; Kennedy E; Govindarajan A
    BJS Open; 2022 Sep; 6(5):. PubMed ID: 36124901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Institutional variation in survival and morbidity in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: From the data of a randomized controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic surgery (JCOG0404).
    Katayama H; Inomata M; Mizusawa J; Nakamura K; Watanabe M; Akagi T; Yamamoto S; Ito M; Kinugasa Y; Okajima M; Takemasa I; Okuda J; Shida D; Kanemitsu Y; Kitano S
    Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2021 Nov; 5(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 34755014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. With widespread adoption of MIS colectomy for colon cancer, does hospital type matter?
    Freischlag K; Adam M; Turner M; Watson J; Ezekian B; Schroder PM; Mantyh C; Migaly J
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jan; 33(1):159-168. PubMed ID: 29946919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective assessment of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision performance: a systematic review.
    Curtis NJ; Davids J; Foster JD; Francis NK
    Tech Coloproctol; 2017 Apr; 21(4):259-268. PubMed ID: 28470365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The positive impact of surgical quality control on adequate lymph node harvest by standardized laparoscopic surgery and national quality assessment program in colorectal cancer.
    Won DD; Choi SB; Lee YS; Oh ST; Kim JG; Lee IK
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Jul; 32(7):975-982. PubMed ID: 28190102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between County-Level Surgeon Density and Mortality from Colorectal Cancer.
    Albarrak J; Firouzbakht A; Peixoto RD; Ho MY; Cheung WY
    J Gastrointest Cancer; 2016 Dec; 47(4):389-395. PubMed ID: 27221330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current Status of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
    Fleshman J
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 May; 20(5):1056-64. PubMed ID: 26831061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Annual case volume has no impact on patient outcomes in laparoscopic partial colectomy.
    Daly SC; Klairmont MM; Francescatti AB; Myers JA; Deziel DJ; Luu MB
    Surg Endosc; 2014 May; 28(5):1648-52. PubMed ID: 24442677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of caseload in determining outcome following laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: an observational study.
    Burns EM; Mamidanna R; Currie A; Bottle A; Aylin P; Darzi A; Faiz OD
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Jan; 28(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 24052341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can technical factors explain the volume-outcome relationship in gastric bypass surgery?
    Smith MD; Patterson E; Wahed AS; Belle SH; Courcoulas AP; Flum D; Khandelwal S; Mitchell JE; Pomp A; Pories WJ; Wolfe B
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2013; 9(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 23274125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.