281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18949518)
1. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films.
Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Ilgüy D; Bayirli G
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of monitor display on detection of approximal caries lesions in digital radiographs.
Isidor S; Faaborg-Andersen M; Hintze H; Kirkevang LL; Frydenberg M; Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Dec; 38(8):537-41. PubMed ID: 20026711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth.
Crombie K; Parker ME; Nortje CJ; Sanderink GC
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.
Sogur E; Baksı BG; Orhan K; Paksoy SC; Dogan S; Erdal YS; Mert A
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Geraets WG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: comparison with conventional radiography.
Svanaes DB; Møystad A; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Jul; 82(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 8843461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.
Wenzel A; Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 10740474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Noack MJ
Caries Res; 2001; 35(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 11385199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection.
Ludlow JB; Abreu M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10202475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
