343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18949518)
21. Influence of the digital image display monitor on observer performance.
Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 10455382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries.
Belém MD; Ambrosano GM; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Haiter-Neto F
Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 23739784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of direct digital and conventional imaging with Ekta Speed Plus and INSIGHT films for the detection of approximal caries.
de Araujo EA; Castilho JC; Medici Filho E; de Moraes ME
Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 16296430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Observer differentiation of mechanical defects versus natural dental caries cavitations on monitor-displayed images with imaging plate readout.
Kang BC; Goldsmith LJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Nov; 86(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 9830655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of proximal caries in vitro using standard and task-specific enhanced images from a storage phosphor plate system.
Li G; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE; Syriopoulos K; van der Stelt PF
Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 17426405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of delayed scanning of storage phosphor plates on occlusal caries detection.
Sogur E; Baksi BG; Mert A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 May; 41(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 22282506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An in vitro comparison of diagnostic abilities of conventional radiography, storage phosphor, and cone beam computed tomography to determine occlusal and approximal caries.
Kayipmaz S; Sezgin ÖS; Saricaoğlu ST; Çan G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 20934291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries.
Shi XQ; Han P; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 11175273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Nair M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9474625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance of a new F-speed film for caries detection.
Ludlow JB; Abreu M; Mol A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 11313732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries.
Pontual AA; de Melo DP; de Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Detectability of T1a lung cancer on digital chest radiographs: an observer-performance comparison among 2-megapixel general-purpose, 2-megapixel medical-purpose, and 3-megapixel medical-purpose liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Jinnnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Nagao M; Kawanami S; Okamoto T; Sasaki M; Honda H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 25168020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Impact of lossy image compression on accuracy of caries detection in digital images taken with a storage phosphor system.
Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Mar; 81(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 8653470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of enamel-dentin caries lesions detection using bitewing PSP digital images.
Torres MG; Santos Ada S; Neves FS; Arriaga ML; Campos PS; Crusoé-Rebello I
J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Oct; 19(5):462-8. PubMed ID: 21986650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
