These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18949604)
1. Measurement capability of field portable organic vapor monitoring instruments under different experimental conditions. Coffey CC; Pearce TA; Lawrence RB; Hudnall JB; Slaven JE; Martin SB J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Jan; 6(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18949604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of calibration and environmental condition on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors. Coffey C; LeBouf R; Lee L; Slaven J; Martin S J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(11):670-80. PubMed ID: 23016630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of calibration environment on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors. LeBouf RF; Slaven JE; Coffey CC J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 May; 63(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 23786144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response times in organic vapor instruments. Drummond I J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Jun; 6(6):D25-6; author reply D26. PubMed ID: 19288334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of the response of some portable, direct-reading 10.2 eV and 11.8 eV photoionization detectors, and a flame ionization gas chromatograph for organic vapors in high humidity atmospheres. Barsky JB; Que Hee SS; Clark CS Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Jan; 46(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 4025151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of organophosphate pesticides using a prototype liquid crystal monitor. Adgate JL; Barteková A; Raynor PC; Griggs JG; Ryan AD; Acharya BR; Volkmann CJ; Most DD; Lai S; Bonds MD J Environ Monit; 2009 Jan; 11(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 19137139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of interferents on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors. LeBouf RF; Coffey CC J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Mar; 65(3):261-9. PubMed ID: 25947122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moisture vapor transmission rates of various transparent dressings at different temperatures and humidities. Lin YS; Chen J; Li Q; Pan KP Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Apr; 122(8):927-30. PubMed ID: 19493416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a portable gas chromatograph with photoionization detector under variations of VOC concentration, temperature, and relative humidity. Soo JC; Lee EG; LeBouf RF; Kashon ML; Chisholm W; Harper M J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Apr; 15(4):351-360. PubMed ID: 29333991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Blind testing of commercially available short-term radon detectors. Sun K; Budd G; McLemore S; Field RW Health Phys; 2008 Jun; 94(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 18469588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mercury vapor levels in exhaust air from dental vacuum systems. Stone ME; Cohen ME; Debban BA Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 16678246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory and field validation of a combined NO2-SO2 Radiello passive sampler. Swaans W; Goelen E; De Fré R; Damen E; Van Avermaet P; Roekens E; Keppens V J Environ Monit; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1231-40. PubMed ID: 17968450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A laboratory evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the photovac snapshot portable gas chromatograph and the Dräger Chip Measurement System monitor for benzene in air measurements. Verma DK; Saunders GA; Cheng WK Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Aug; 16(8):832-40. PubMed ID: 11504361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Field investigation comparing diffusion badge and charcoal tube monitoring for styrene. Dobos RT Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Sep; 15(9):673-6. PubMed ID: 10983400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of humidity and temperature on filter and gravimetric measurement of ambient particulate matter in a balance room]. Su WJ; Wang LM; Weng SF; Wang HJ; Du LL; Liu YW; Yang L; Chen WH Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 26(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 18724889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field evaluation of thermal and chemical desorption BTEX radial diffusive sampler radiello compared with active (pumped) samplers for ambient air measurements. Cocheo C; Boaretto C; Pagani D; Quaglio F; Sacco P; Zaratin L; Cottica D J Environ Monit; 2009 Feb; 11(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 19212585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term monitoring of formaldehyde: comparison of two direct-reading instruments to a laboratory-based method. Hirst DV; Gressel MG; Flanders WD J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jun; 8(6):357-63. PubMed ID: 21557128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of relative humidity on the adsorption of selected water-miscible organic vapors by activated carbon. Kawar KH; Underhill DW Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 10635538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benzene in air--organic vapor monitors versus charcoal tubes. Pristas R Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Jul; 52(7):297-304. PubMed ID: 1951067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hand-held photoionization instruments for quantitative detection of sarin vapor and for rapid qualitative screening of contaminated objects. Smith PA; Lepage CJ; Harrer KL; Brochu PJ J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Oct; 4(10):729-38. PubMed ID: 17668359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]