These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18950062)

  • 1. Fracture resistance of acrylic resin and metal-reinforced acrylic resin distal extension cantilevers of fixed implant-supported prostheses.
    Osswald MA; Owen CP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(5):413-4. PubMed ID: 18950062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.
    Holst S; Geiselhoeringer H; Wichmann M; Holst AI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 18762029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of two methods of reinforcement on the fracture strength of interim fixed partial dentures.
    Fahmy NZ; Sharawi A
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 19432757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations.
    Ciftçi Y; Canay S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 10960992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
    Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reinforcement of denture acrylic resin: the effect of metal inserts and denture resin type on fracture resistance.
    Polyzois GL
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):275-8. PubMed ID: 8603172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary zirconia implant fixed partial dentures opposing an acrylic resin implant fixed complete denture: a two-year clinical report.
    Chang PP; Henegbarth EA; Lang LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):321-30. PubMed ID: 17618914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Failure modes with point loading of three commercially available denture teeth.
    Moffitt AR; Woody RD; Parel SM; Miller BH
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):432-8. PubMed ID: 18482363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo registration of force development with ceramic and acrylic resin occlusal materials on implant-supported prostheses.
    Bassit R; Lindström H; Rangert B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11858570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical strength of an acrylic resin palatal denture base reinforced with a mesh or bundle of glass fibers.
    Hedzelek W; Gajdus P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):311-2. PubMed ID: 17580466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
    Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of length parameter on the repair strength of acrylic resin using fibers or metal wires.
    Kostoulas IE; Kavoura VT; Frangou MJ; Polyzois GL
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18254560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
    Kinsel RP; Lin D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-pinning: the philosophy of retrievability applied practically to fixed, implant-supported prostheses.
    Gervais MJ; Hatzipanagiotis P; Wilson PR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 18304245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of prosthesis material on the loading of implants that support a fixed partial prosthesis: in vivo study.
    Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H; Vander Sloten J; De Cooman M; Puers R; Naert I
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 11359263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cement-retained superstructure for a metal-resin fixed complete denture.
    McCracken M; Simmons B; Simmons W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):298-300. PubMed ID: 15775933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impression techniques for multiple implants: a photoelastic analysis. Part II: comparison of four acrylic resins.
    Lopes-Júnior I; de Lima Lucas B; Gomide HA; Gomes VL
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 39(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 22208886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.