These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Patient assessment for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Past, present and future of imaging techniques. Auger D; Ducharme A; Harel F; Thibault B; O'Meara E Can J Cardiol; 2010 Jan; 26(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 20101354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A better mousetrap? The search for an improved CRT optimization technique. Spragg DD; Calkins H J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Dec; 18(12):1258-60. PubMed ID: 17916149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. QRS duration alone to select patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy: flying in the face of the evidence? Hawkins NM; Petrie MC; Macdonald MR; Hogg KJ; McMurray JJ Eur Heart J; 2006 Dec; 27(24):3074-5; author reply 3075. PubMed ID: 17121753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Assessment of dyssynchrony in patients with severe heart failure by nuclear imaging: paradise lost and regained or lost and gone forever? Mule JD; Martinelli F Ital Heart J; 2005 Feb; 6(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 15819502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Beyond dyssynchrony: what are the factors determining the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?]. Mele D; Toselli T; Dal Monte A; Guardigli G; Ceconi C; Ferrari R G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2008 May; 9(5):320-37. PubMed ID: 18678224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Temporary epicardial pacing after cardiac surgery: a practical review: part 1: general considerations in the management of epicardial pacing. Reade MC Anaesthesia; 2007 Mar; 62(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 17300304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy: addressing the problem of "non-responders". Fox DJ; Fitzpatrick AP; Davidson NC Heart; 2005 Aug; 91(8):1000-2. PubMed ID: 16020582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in assessing cardiac veins and scar tissue. Van de Veire NR; Schuijf JD; Bleeker GB; Schalij MJ; Bax JJ Europace; 2008 Nov; 10 Suppl 3():iii110-3. PubMed ID: 18955391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Biomarkers in electrophysiology: role in arrhythmias and resynchronization therapy. Bose A; Truong QA; Singh JP J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 43(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 25715916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Echocardiographic evaluation for selection of candidates for CRT: the validity issue! Paul B J Assoc Physicians India; 2011 Mar; 59():191-2. PubMed ID: 21751639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Functional capacity as a criterion for patient selection--too poor or too good for CRT?]. Schlegl M; Butter C Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2006; 17 Suppl 1():I42-50. PubMed ID: 16598621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Transesophageal imaging and interventions: nursing implications. Marchiondo K Crit Care Nurse; 2007 Apr; 27(2):25-8, 30, 32 passim; quiz 36. PubMed ID: 17389411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Is mechanical dyssynchrony assessment better than electrocardiogram for predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy responder? Pu M Cardiology; 2010; 115(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 19828946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]