These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18950695)

  • 1. Acquisition of peak responding: what is learned?
    Balci F; Gallistel CR; Allen BD; Frank KM; Gibson JM; Brunner D
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 18950695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Within-session modulation of timed anticipatory responding: when to start responding.
    Balci F; Ludvig EA; Brunner D
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):204-6. PubMed ID: 20600698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sources of variability and systematic error in mouse timing behavior.
    Gallistel CR; King A; McDonald R
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2004 Jan; 30(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 14709111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fewer peak trials per session facilitate acquisition of peak responding despite elimination of response rate differences.
    Kaiser DH
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 18793706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impulsive responding on the peak-interval procedure.
    Matell MS; Portugal GS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 17023122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning to stop or reset the internal clock.
    Orduña V; Bouzas A
    Behav Processes; 2011 Nov; 88(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 21907270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rats can learn a temporal task in a single session.
    Reyes MB; de Miranda DH; Tunes GC; Cravo AM; Caetano MS
    Behav Processes; 2020 Jan; 170():103986. PubMed ID: 31783298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timing in pigeons: effects of the similarity between intertrial interval and gap in a timing signal.
    Kaiser DH; Zentall TR; Neiman E
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):416-22. PubMed ID: 12395499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female mini-pig performance of temporal response differentiation, incremental repeated acquisition, and progressive ratio operant tasks.
    Ferguson SA; Gopee NV; Paule MG; Howard PC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jan; 80(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 18804519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reinforcer concentration effects on a fixed-interval schedule.
    Blomeley FJ; Lowe CF; Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 15182926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amphetamine affects the start of responding in the peak interval timing task.
    Taylor KM; Horvitz JC; Balsam PD
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 17222991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timing in a variable interval procedure: evidence for a memory singularity.
    Matell MS; Kim JS; Hartshorne L
    Behav Processes; 2014 Jan; 101():49-57. PubMed ID: 24012783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reward magnitude and timing in pigeons.
    Ludvig EA; Balci F; Spetch ML
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 21244854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Appetitively motivated instrumental learning in SynGAP heterozygous knockout mice.
    Muhia M; Feldon J; Knuesel I; Yee BK
    Behav Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 123(5):1114-28. PubMed ID: 19824778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Choice and timing in concurrent chains: effects of initial-link duration.
    Grace RC; Berg ME; Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):188-200. PubMed ID: 16388918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disrupted temporal control in the R6/2 mouse model of Huntington's disease.
    Balci F; Day M; Rooney A; Brunner D
    Behav Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 123(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 20001119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event.
    Aum S; Brown BL; Hemmes NS
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 17157998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of unpredictable changes in initial-link duration on choice and timing.
    Kyonka EG; Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 19429216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure duration modifies the effects of low level lead of fixed-interval performance.
    Cory-Slechta DA
    Neurotoxicology; 1990; 11(3):427-41. PubMed ID: 2284049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pigeons learn signal-food intervals independently in a multiple peak procedure.
    Rice N; Grace RC; Kyonka EG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 24364669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.