These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18950695)

  • 21. Pigeons learn signal-food intervals independently in a multiple peak procedure.
    Rice N; Grace RC; Kyonka EG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2014 Apr; 40(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 24364669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The start-stop procedure: estimation of temporal intervals by human subjects.
    Kladopoulos CN; Brown BL; Hemmes NS; Cabeza de Vaca S
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 9599994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Timing in response-initiated fixed intervals.
    Fox AE; Kyonka EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Mar; 103(2):375-92. PubMed ID: 25533195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Environmental dynamics modulate covariation of choice and timing.
    Subramaniam S; Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2016 Mar; 124():130-40. PubMed ID: 26802787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal generalization accounts for response resurgence in the peak procedure.
    Sanabria F; Killeen PR
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):126-41. PubMed ID: 17141981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of timing and classical conditioning.
    Holder MD; Roberts S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):172-93. PubMed ID: 4009120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A neural network model of adaptively timed reinforcement learning and hippocampal dynamics.
    Grossberg S; Merrill JW
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1992 Jun; 1(1):3-38. PubMed ID: 15497433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An assessment of horse (Equus ferus caballus) responding on fixed interval schedules of reinforcement: An individual analysis.
    Craig DP; Varnon CA; Pollock KL; Abramson CI
    Behav Processes; 2015 Nov; 120():1-13. PubMed ID: 26297471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of scalar timing theory to individual trials.
    Church RM; Meck WH; Gibbon J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1994 Apr; 20(2):135-55. PubMed ID: 8189184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Generalization of delayed matching to sample following training at different delays.
    Sargisson RJ; White KG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11256863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of multiple temporal memories in the peak-interval procedure.
    Wilson AG; Matell MS; Crystal JD
    Learn Behav; 2015 Jun; 43(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 25731983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reinforcement omission in concurrent fixed-interval and random-interval schedules.
    Ishii T; Sakagami T
    Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17275211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency of network synchronization in the hippocampus marks learning.
    Ponomarenko AA; Li JS; Korotkova TM; Huston JP; Haas HL
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 27(11):3035-42. PubMed ID: 18588541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The long-term effect of high- and low-rate responding histories on fixed-interval responding in rats.
    Cole MR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 11256866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When to respond? And how much? Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable components.
    Whitaker S; Lowe CF; Wearden JH
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 17628349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rapid acquisition of choice and timing in pigeons.
    Kyonka EG; Grace RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct; 33(4):392-408. PubMed ID: 17924788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improving conditional discrimination learning and memory in five-year-old children: differential outcomes effect using different types of reinforcement.
    Martínez L; Estévez AF; Fuentes LJ; Overmier JB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1617-30. PubMed ID: 19214832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigations of timing during the schedule and reinforcement intervals with wheel-running reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Christie-Fougere MM
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 16844324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Response timing and development: fixed-interval performance in precociously weaned rats.
    Lejeune H
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Feb; 44(2):101-22. PubMed ID: 1561382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. "The stone which the builders rejected...": Delay of reinforcement and response rate on fixed-interval and related schedules.
    Wearden JH; Lejeune H
    Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):77-87. PubMed ID: 16307848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.