BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

879 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18950836)

  • 1. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
    Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
    Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Hussain A; Whelan P; Piercey K; Kapoor A
    Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.
    Gao ZL; Shi L; Yang MS; Wang L; Yang DD; Sun DK; Liu QZ; Men CP; Wu JT; Zhang P
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 May; 119(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 16732987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair.
    Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M
    Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
    Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (report of 150 cases).
    Chuanyu S; Guowei X; Ke X; Qiang D; Yuanfang Z
    Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1036-40. PubMed ID: 19660798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
    Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: using reconstructive methods based on intraoperative findings.
    Kawa G; Tatsumi M; Hiura Y; Muguruma K; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
    Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1171-4. PubMed ID: 16984547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outpatient laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Rubinstein M; Finelli A; Moinzadeh A; Singh D; Ukimura O; Desai MM; Kaouk JH; Gill IS
    Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):41-3; discussion 43-4. PubMed ID: 15992881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after both failed open repair and endoscopic salvage.
    Levin BM; Herrell SD
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):808-12. PubMed ID: 17094759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.
    Patel V
    Urology; 2005 Jul; 66(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15992879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Kojima Y; Sasaki S; Mizuno K; Tozawa K; Hayashi Y; Kohri K
    Int J Urol; 2009 May; 16(5):472-6. PubMed ID: 19383038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: outcome of initial 12 procedures.
    Iwamura M; Soh S; Irie A; Kadowaki K; Matsusita Y; Fujioka T; Baba S
    Int J Urol; 2004 Jul; 11(7):449-55. PubMed ID: 15242351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair.
    Troxel S; Das S; Helfer E; Nugyen M
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1073-6. PubMed ID: 16890693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: experience with 50 cases.
    Zhang X; Li HZ; Wang SG; Ma X; Zheng T; Fu B; Zhang J; Ye ZQ
    Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):514-7. PubMed ID: 16140068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
    Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Abdel-Karim AM; Fahmy A; Moussa A; Rashad H; Elbadry M; Badawy H; Hammady A
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):401.e1-401.e6. PubMed ID: 27614698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.