201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18951059)
41. Factors affecting patients' attitudes toward single- and multiple-embryo transfer.
Newton CR; McBride J; Feyles V; Tekpetey F; Power S
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 17097648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates.
Ryan GL; Sparks AE; Sipe CS; Syrop CH; Dokras A; Van Voorhis BJ
Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug; 88(2):354-60. PubMed ID: 17490657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Minimising twins in in vitro fertilisation: a modelling study assessing the costs, consequences and cost-utility of elective single versus double embryo transfer over a 20-year time horizon.
Scotland GS; McLernon D; Kurinczuk JJ; McNamee P; Harrild K; Lyall H; Rajkhowa M; Hamilton M; Bhattacharya S
BJOG; 2011 Aug; 118(9):1073-83. PubMed ID: 21477172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Attitudes of German infertile couples towards multiple births and elective embryo transfer.
Borkenhagen A; Brähler E; Kentenich H
Hum Reprod; 2007 Nov; 22(11):2883-7. PubMed ID: 17898085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Does single embryo transfer improve the obstetric and neonatal outcome of singleton pregnancy?
Poikkeus P; Tiitinen A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(9):888-92. PubMed ID: 18720030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Single embryo transfer (set) not only leads to a reduction in twinning rates after IVF/ICSI, but also improves obstetrical and perinatal outcome of singletons.
De Sutter P
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2006; 68(5-6):319-27. PubMed ID: 17313092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Elective single versus double embryo transfer: live birth outcome and patient acceptance in a prospective randomised trial.
Prados N; Quiroga R; Caligara C; Ruiz M; Blasco V; Pellicer A; Fernández-Sánchez M
Reprod Fertil Dev; 2015 Jun; 27(5):794-800. PubMed ID: 25128910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study.
Hope N; Rombauts L
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jul; 94(2):489-95. PubMed ID: 19442970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. During IVF treatment patient preference shifts from singletons towards twins but only a few patients show an actual reversal of preference.
Fiddelers AA; Nieman FH; Dumoulin JC; van Montfoort AP; Land JA; Evers JL; Severens JL; Dirksen CD
Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):2092-100. PubMed ID: 21546387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers.
Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Cadoret V; Jamet C; Royere D
Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19218575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different embryo transfer strategies in England.
Dixon S; Faghih Nasiri F; Ledger WL; Lenton EA; Duenas A; Sutcliffe P; Chilcott JB
BJOG; 2008 May; 115(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 18355368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Benefits and challenges brought by improved results from in vitro fertilization.
Jansen RP
Intern Med J; 2005 Feb; 35(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 15705142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction].
Romundstad LB; Sunde A; Kjøtrød S; Stoum H; Kierulf KH; Lippe B; Wold A; von Düring V
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Nov; 126(23):3098-100. PubMed ID: 17160113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Elective single embryo transfer (eSET)--the way to decrease the risk for multiple pregnancy].
Streda R
Ceska Gynekol; 2007 Dec; 72(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 18236895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer. ESHRE Campus Course Report.
Hum Reprod; 2001 Apr; 16(4):790-800. PubMed ID: 11278236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Implantation of the human embryo: clinical and epidemiological aspects.
Delbaere I
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2008; 70(4):257-83. PubMed ID: 19166099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Cumulative delivery rate in an in vitro fertilization program with a single embryo transfer policy.
Sundström P; Saldeen P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(6):700-6. PubMed ID: 19455443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. IVF twins: buy one get one free?
Ismail L; Mittal M; Kalu E
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2012 Oct; 38(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 22810047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Is it justified to transfer two embryos in oocyte donation? A pilot randomized clinical trial.
Clua E; Tur R; Coroleu B; Rodríguez I; Boada M; Gómez MJ; Barri PN; Veiga A
Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Aug; 31(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 26096029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The difference in pregnancy rates between elective single embryo transfer (SET) compared to double embryo transfer is dependent on the implantation rates of embryos being transferred. Using mathematical modeling to determine when SET becomes a viable option.
Thompson J; Lane M
Hum Reprod; 2006 Aug; 21(8):2195; author reply 2195-6. PubMed ID: 16887928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
