201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18951059)
61. [Single embryo transfer : impact of new Belgian legislation on the results of the Clinic of Fertility of the Erasme Hospital].
Salame Y; Englert Y; Emiliani S; Revelard P; Delbaere A; Devreker F
Rev Med Brux; 2007; 28(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 17561721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Single-embryo transfer versus multiple-embryo transfer.
Gerris J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2009; 18 Suppl 2():63-70. PubMed ID: 19406034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [Single-embryo transfer: Rennes' Hospital experience].
Le Lannou D; Laurent MC; Griveau JF; Véron E; Jaffré F; Jouve G; Gueho A; Morcel K
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Nov; 36(11):1158-61. PubMed ID: 18849181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Redefining success in the context of elective single embryo transfer: evidence, intuition and financial reality.
Bhattacharya S; Templeton A
Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1939-42. PubMed ID: 15217994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer.
Gleicher N; Barad D
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jun; 21(6):1337-44. PubMed ID: 16495304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Reduction of the multiple pregnancy rate in a preimplantation genetic diagnosis programme after introduction of single blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of blastocysts biopsied on day 3.
El-Toukhy T; Kamal A; Wharf E; Grace J; Bolton V; Khalaf Y; Braude P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Oct; 24(10):2642-8. PubMed ID: 19567414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Defining outcome in ART: a Gordian knot of safety, efficacy and quality.
Land JA; Evers JL
Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1046-8. PubMed ID: 15016768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Twin births, sex of children and maternal risk of endometrial cancer: a cohort study in Norway.
Albrektsen G; Heuch I; Thoresen S; Kvåle G
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1123-8. PubMed ID: 18951203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Patient attitudes towards twin pregnancies and SET: a questionnaire study.
Garel M; Blondel B; Karpel L; Blanchet V; Breart G; Frydman R; Olivennes F
Hum Reprod; 2008 May; 23(5):1232-3; author reply 1233-4. PubMed ID: 18334679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred.
;
Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1518-9. PubMed ID: 19836732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. [Multiple pregnancies after ART: problems and possible solutions].
Shebl O; Ebner T; Sommergruber M; Sir A; Urdl W; Tews G
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17272931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art.
Basille C; Frydman R; El Aly A; Hesters L; Fanchin R; Tachdjian G; Steffann J; LeLorc'h M; Achour-Frydman N
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Jul; 145(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19411132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer.
Staessen C; Verpoest W; Donoso P; Haentjens P; Van der Elst J; Liebaers I; Devroey P
Hum Reprod; 2008 Dec; 23(12):2818-25. PubMed ID: 18930977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. A randomized controlled study of human serum albumin and serum substitute supplement as protein supplements for IVF culture and the effect on live birth rates.
Meintjes M; Chantilis SJ; Ward DC; Douglas JD; Rodriguez AJ; Guerami AR; Bookout DM; Barnett BD; Madden JD
Hum Reprod; 2009 Apr; 24(4):782-9. PubMed ID: 19147504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Defining women who are prone to have twins in in vitro fertilization--a necessary step towards single embryo transfer.
Hellberg D; Blennborn M; Nilsson S
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2005 May; 22(5):199-206. PubMed ID: 16047581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Investigation of staff and patients' opinions of a proposed trial of elective single embryo transfer.
Porter M; Bhattacharya S
Hum Reprod; 2005 Sep; 20(9):2523-30. PubMed ID: 15905288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Effects of patient education on desire for twins and use of elective single embryo transfer procedures during ART treatment: A systematic review.
Sunderam S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2018 Aug; 6():102-119. PubMed ID: 30761357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice.
Tobias T; Sharara FI; Franasiak JM; Heiser PW; Pinckney-Clark E
Fertil Res Pract; 2016; 2():1. PubMed ID: 28620526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Monochorionic triplet and monoamniotic twins gestation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and laser-assisted hatching.
Pantos K; Kokkali G; Petroutsou K; Lekka K; Malligiannis P; Koratzis A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2009; 25(1):144-7. PubMed ID: 19279392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Actual controversies in twin delivery: from the analysis of the case histories to a reasoned protocol.
Valsecchi L; Serafini A; Maniscalsco L; Frontino G; Cardani A; Cavoretto P
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Feb; 61(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 19204658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
