These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

827 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18952108)

  • 1. Tracking prey or tracking the prey's resource? Mechanisms of movement and optimal habitat selection by predators.
    Flaxman SM; Lou Y
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 18952108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Habitat choice in predator-prey systems: spatial instability due to interacting adaptive movements.
    Abrams PA
    Am Nat; 2007 May; 169(5):581-94. PubMed ID: 17427130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial dynamics of communities with intraguild predation: the role of dispersal strategies.
    Amarasekare P
    Am Nat; 2007 Dec; 170(6):819-31. PubMed ID: 18171165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resource dynamics influence the strength of non-consumptive predator effects on prey.
    Preisser EL; Bolnick DI; Grabowski JH
    Ecol Lett; 2009 Apr; 12(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 19243407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The positive effects of negative interactions: can avoidance of competitors or predators increase resource sampling by prey?
    Bell AV; Rader RB; Peck SL; Sih A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Aug; 76(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19371755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Productivity, dispersal and the coexistence of intraguild predators and prey.
    Amarasekare P
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Nov; 243(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 16860826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biodiversity as both a cause and consequence of resource availability: a study of reciprocal causality in a predator-prey system.
    Cardinale BJ; Weis JJ; Forbes AE; Tilmon KJ; Ives AR
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Mar; 75(2):497-505. PubMed ID: 16638002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of prey hotspots by an avian predator: purposeful unpredictability?
    Roth TC; Lima SL
    Am Nat; 2007 Feb; 169(2):264-73. PubMed ID: 17211809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What happens when predators do not completely consume their prey?
    Mittler J
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Jun; 51(3):238-51. PubMed ID: 9245778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predator and prey space use: dragonflies and tadpoles in an interactive game.
    Hammond JI; Luttbeg B; Sih A
    Ecology; 2007 Jun; 88(6):1525-35. PubMed ID: 17601144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of density dependent migrations on the dynamics of a predator prey model.
    Mchich R; Bergam A; Raïssi N
    Acta Biotheor; 2005; 53(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 16583273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolutionary dynamics of prey exploitation in a metapopulation of predators.
    Pels B; de Roos AM; Sabelis MW
    Am Nat; 2002 Feb; 159(2):172-89. PubMed ID: 18707412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Directed movement of predators and the emergence of density-dependence in predator-prey models.
    Arditi R; Tyutyunov Y; Morgulis A; Govorukhin V; Senina I
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 May; 59(3):207-21. PubMed ID: 11444960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transient dynamics limit the effectiveness of keystone predation in bringing about coexistence.
    Noonburg EG; Abrams PA
    Am Nat; 2005 Mar; 165(3):322-35. PubMed ID: 15729663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How the informational environment shapes how prey estimate predation risk and the resulting indirect effects of predators.
    Luttbeg B; Trussell GC
    Am Nat; 2013 Feb; 181(2):182-94. PubMed ID: 23348773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of handling time can destroy the coexistence of cycling predators.
    Kisdi E; Liu S
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jan; 19(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 16405576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling direct positive feedback between predators and prey.
    Brown DH; Ferris H; Fu S; Plant R
    Theor Popul Biol; 2004 Mar; 65(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 14766188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of vigilance on intraguild predation.
    Kimbrell T; Holt RD; Lundberg P
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(2):218-34. PubMed ID: 17888456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal Bayesian foraging policies and prey population dynamics-some comments on Rodriguez-Girones and Vasquez.
    Olsson O; Holmgren NM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Jun; 57(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 10900189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Group formation stabilizes predator-prey dynamics.
    Fryxell JM; Mosser A; Sinclair AR; Packer C
    Nature; 2007 Oct; 449(7165):1041-3. PubMed ID: 17960242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.