BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18952575)

  • 1. The uptake of cervical cancer screening by renal transplant recipients.
    Courtney AE; Leonard N; O'Neill CJ; McNamee PT; Maxwell AP
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Feb; 24(2):647-52. PubMed ID: 18952575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The health and economic impact of cervical cancer screening and human papillomavirus vaccination in kidney transplant recipients.
    Wong G; Howard K; Webster A; Chapman JR; Craig JC
    Transplantation; 2009 Apr; 87(7):1078-91. PubMed ID: 19352131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing.
    Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F; Sciortino S
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2009; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audit of cervical screening in women with HIV infection in the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand.
    Grewal J; Lowe M; Gerrard H; Henley R; Perkins N; Briggs S
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):71-8. PubMed ID: 20717179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical cytology in vulnerable pregnant women.
    Loomis DM; Pastore PA; Rejman K; Gutierrez KL; Bethea B
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2009 May; 21(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 19432913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study of the women overdue for a smear test in a general practice cervical screening programme.
    Meadows P
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Nov; 37(304):500-3. PubMed ID: 3505643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cancer risk factors and predictors of cervical dysplasia among women in south-west Nigeria.
    Ogunbowale T; Lawoyin TO
    Aust J Rural Health; 2008 Dec; 16(6):338-42. PubMed ID: 19032205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for cervical cancer among female physicians and their relatives in Taiwan: a population-based comparative study.
    Chen LS; Huang N; Tsay JH; Wang PJ; Chou YJ; Chou P; Lee CH
    Prev Med; 2007 Jun; 44(6):531-5. PubMed ID: 17467786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abnormal cervical cytology in bone marrow transplant recipients.
    Sasadeusz J; Kelly H; Szer J; Schwarer AP; Mitchell H; Grigg A
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 Aug; 28(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 11571513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laboratory performance measures: evidence against low-risk women explaining low detection rates of high-grade abnormalities.
    Mitchell HS
    Cytopathology; 2005 Apr; 16(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 15787649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Poor uptake of reproductive health screening services by female renal transplant recipients.
    Kerkhoff BA; O'Connor TC; Plant WD; Higgins
    Ir Med J; 2006 Mar; 99(3):78-80. PubMed ID: 16700259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening for cervical carcinoma.
    van Leeuwen AW; de Nooijer P; Hop WC
    Cancer; 2005 Oct; 105(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 15937918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.
    Koong SL; Yen AM; Chen TH
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 17227642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.
    Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latino women.
    Buki LP; Jamison J; Anderson CJ; Cuadra AM
    Cancer; 2007 Oct; 110(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 17696119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
    Ridsdale LL
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.