BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18952853)

  • 1. Discrimination of speech sounds based upon temporal envelope versus fine structure cues in 5- to 7-year-old children.
    Bertoncini J; Serniclaes W; Lorenzi C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):682-95. PubMed ID: 18952853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of temporal fine-structure cues in speech with minimal envelope cues for listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
    Ardoint M; Sheft S; Fleuriot P; Garnier S; Lorenzi C
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Nov; 49(11):823-31. PubMed ID: 20666687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues.
    Gilbert G; Bergeras I; Voillery D; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1336. PubMed ID: 17927396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Importance of temporal-envelope speech cues in different spectral regions.
    Ardoint M; Agus T; Sheft S; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):EL115-21. PubMed ID: 21877769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues.
    Ardoint M; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 19963053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six-month-old infants discriminate voicing on the basis of temporal envelope cues (L).
    Bertoncini J; Nazzi T; Cabrera L; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):2761-4. PubMed ID: 21568380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli.
    Lister J; Tarver K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 15157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
    Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cantonese tone recognition with enhanced temporal periodicity cues.
    Yuan M; Lee T; Yuen KC; Soli SD; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):327-37. PubMed ID: 19603889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal envelope changes of compression and speech rate: combined effects on recognition for older adults.
    Jenstad LM; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1123-38. PubMed ID: 17905900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the Mandarin early speech perception test: children with normal hearing and the effects of dialect exposure.
    Zheng Y; Meng ZL; Wang K; Tao Y; Xu K; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):600-12. PubMed ID: 19726935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Léger AC; Desloge JG; Braida LD; Swaminathan J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):505-8. PubMed ID: 25618081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory discrimination profiles of speech sound changes in 6-year-old children as determined with the multi-feature MMN paradigm.
    Lovio R; Pakarinen S; Huotilainen M; Alku P; Silvennoinen S; Näätänen R; Kujala T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):916-21. PubMed ID: 19386542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rise time and formant transition duration in the discrimination of speech sounds: the Ba-Wa distinction in developmental dyslexia.
    Goswami U; Fosker T; Huss M; Mead N; Szucs D
    Dev Sci; 2011 Jan; 14(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 21159086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.