These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18954172)

  • 21. Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 49(Pt A):47-54. PubMed ID: 27237958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
    Brewer TW
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials.
    Maeder EM; Yamamoto S; McLaughlin KJ
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101536. PubMed ID: 32033700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Political rhetoric, immigration attitudes, and contemporary prejudice: a Mexican American dilemma.
    Short R; Magaña L
    J Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 142(6):701-12. PubMed ID: 12450345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making.
    Greene E; Cahill BS
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 22213023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring perceptions of cancer care delivery among older Mexican American adults.
    Campesino M
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2009 Jul; 36(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 19581231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.
    Ruva CL; McEvoy C
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 18808276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Considering her circumstances: how ethnicity and cultural relativist arguments affect sexual harassment judgments by undergraduate and community mock jurors.
    Schwartz SL; Hunt JS
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):419-38. PubMed ID: 21374704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A third verdict option: exploring the impact of the not proven verdict on mock juror decision making.
    Hope L; Greene E; Memon A; Gavisk M; Houston K
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):241-52. PubMed ID: 17703354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reducing racial bias in the penalty phase of capital trials.
    Shaked-Schroer N; Costanzo M; Marcus-Newhall A
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(5):603-17. PubMed ID: 18788078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mexican- and Anglo-American differences on the psychological screening inventory.
    Negy C; Woods DJ
    J Pers Assess; 1993 Jun; 60(3):543-53. PubMed ID: 16370812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Mexican American mother's experience in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Cleveland LM
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2009; 23(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 19474590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The police officer's dilemma: using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals.
    Correll J; Park B; Judd CM; Wittenbrink B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Dec; 83(6):1314-29. PubMed ID: 12500813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Expert witness confidence and juror personality: their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom.
    Cramer RJ; Brodsky SL; DeCoster J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19297636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The last word in court--a hidden disadvantage for the defense.
    Englich B; Mussweiler T; Strack F
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):705-22. PubMed ID: 16382357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sex and race as factors affecting the attribution of insanity in a murder trial.
    McGlynn RP; Megas JC; Benson DH
    J Psychol; 1976 May; 93(1st Half):93-9. PubMed ID: 1003337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial.
    Forsterlee R; Forsterlee L; Horowitz IA; King E
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):179-98. PubMed ID: 16557616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Valid or voodoo? A qualitative study of attorney perceptions of risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining.
    Metz A; Monahan J; Siebert L; Garrett B
    J Community Psychol; 2020 Aug; 48(6):2053-2068. PubMed ID: 32667056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Defense attorney plea recommendations and client race: does zealous representation apply equally to all?
    Edkins VA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):413-25. PubMed ID: 21103915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Defendant mental illness and juror decision-making: A comparison of sample types.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():58-66. PubMed ID: 26314888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.