487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18954191)
1. Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation.
Rule NO; Ambady N; Adams RB; Macrae CN
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Nov; 95(5):1019-28. PubMed ID: 18954191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues.
Freeman JB; Johnson KL; Ambady N; Rule NO
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1318-31. PubMed ID: 20682754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The politics of gaydar: ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation.
Stern C; West TV; Jost JT; Rule NO
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):520-41. PubMed ID: 23276275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Found in translation: cross-cultural consensus in the accurate categorization of male sexual orientation.
Rule NO; Ishii K; Ambady N; Rosen KS; Hallett KC
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1499-507. PubMed ID: 21807952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal.
Freeman JB; Ambady N; Rule NO; Johnson KL
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):673-90. PubMed ID: 18999360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Judgments of sexual orientation and masculinity-femininity based on thin slices of behavior: a cross-cultural comparison.
Valentova J; Rieger G; Havlicek J; Linsenmeier JA; Bailey JM
Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21879429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology.
Johnson KL; Gill S; Reichman V; Tassinary LG
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Sep; 93(3):321-34. PubMed ID: 17723051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mating interest improves women's accuracy in judging male sexual orientation.
Rule NO; Rosen KS; Slepian ML; Ambady N
Psychol Sci; 2011 Jul; 22(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 21670428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Very first impressions.
Bar M; Neta M; Linz H
Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 16768559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dissecting "gaydar": accuracy and the role of masculinity-femininity.
Rieger G; Linsenmeier JA; Gygax L; Garcia S; Bailey JM
Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Feb; 39(1):124-40. PubMed ID: 18810629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How women's sexual orientation guides accuracy of interpersonal judgements of other women.
Ruben MA; Hill KM; Hall JA
Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(8):1512-21. PubMed ID: 24564873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Facial features influence the categorization of female sexual orientation.
Tskhay KO; Feriozzo MM; Rule NO
Perception; 2013; 42(10):1090-4. PubMed ID: 24494440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Of gnomes and leprechauns: the recruitment of recent and categorical contexts in social judgment.
Pettibone JC; Wedell DH
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):361-89. PubMed ID: 17196919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polling the face: prediction and consensus across cultures.
Rule NO; Ambady N; Adams RB; Ozono H; Nakashima S; Yoshikawa S; Watabe M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jan; 98(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 20053027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Victim sensitivity and the accuracy of social judgments.
Gollwitzer M; Rothmund T; Alt B; Jekel M
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Aug; 38(8):975-84. PubMed ID: 22440732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli.
DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Smith FG; Little AC
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):751-8. PubMed ID: 20515201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments.
Lick DJ; Johnson KL
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 110(6):801-17. PubMed ID: 27281352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beyond categories: Perceiving sexual attraction from faces.
Bjornsdottir RT; Cheso D; Rule NO
Br J Psychol; 2022 Feb; 113(1):226-247. PubMed ID: 34296765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two faces of (dis)similarity in affective judgments of persons: contrast or assimilation effects revealed by morphs.
Ruys KI; Spears R; Gordijn EH; de Vries NK
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):399-411. PubMed ID: 16594827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The dual lens model: a comprehensive framework for understanding self-other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance.
Hirschmüller S; Egloff B; Nestler S; Back MD
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):335-53. PubMed ID: 23046068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
