These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18954191)

  • 1. Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation.
    Rule NO; Ambady N; Adams RB; Macrae CN
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Nov; 95(5):1019-28. PubMed ID: 18954191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues.
    Freeman JB; Johnson KL; Ambady N; Rule NO
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1318-31. PubMed ID: 20682754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The politics of gaydar: ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation.
    Stern C; West TV; Jost JT; Rule NO
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Mar; 104(3):520-41. PubMed ID: 23276275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Found in translation: cross-cultural consensus in the accurate categorization of male sexual orientation.
    Rule NO; Ishii K; Ambady N; Rosen KS; Hallett KC
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1499-507. PubMed ID: 21807952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Will a category cue attract you? Motor output reveals dynamic competition across person construal.
    Freeman JB; Ambady N; Rule NO; Johnson KL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):673-90. PubMed ID: 18999360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judgments of sexual orientation and masculinity-femininity based on thin slices of behavior: a cross-cultural comparison.
    Valentova J; Rieger G; Havlicek J; Linsenmeier JA; Bailey JM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21879429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology.
    Johnson KL; Gill S; Reichman V; Tassinary LG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Sep; 93(3):321-34. PubMed ID: 17723051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mating interest improves women's accuracy in judging male sexual orientation.
    Rule NO; Rosen KS; Slepian ML; Ambady N
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jul; 22(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 21670428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Very first impressions.
    Bar M; Neta M; Linz H
    Emotion; 2006 May; 6(2):269-78. PubMed ID: 16768559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissecting "gaydar": accuracy and the role of masculinity-femininity.
    Rieger G; Linsenmeier JA; Gygax L; Garcia S; Bailey JM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Feb; 39(1):124-40. PubMed ID: 18810629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How women's sexual orientation guides accuracy of interpersonal judgements of other women.
    Ruben MA; Hill KM; Hall JA
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(8):1512-21. PubMed ID: 24564873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial features influence the categorization of female sexual orientation.
    Tskhay KO; Feriozzo MM; Rule NO
    Perception; 2013; 42(10):1090-4. PubMed ID: 24494440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Of gnomes and leprechauns: the recruitment of recent and categorical contexts in social judgment.
    Pettibone JC; Wedell DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):361-89. PubMed ID: 17196919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polling the face: prediction and consensus across cultures.
    Rule NO; Ambady N; Adams RB; Ozono H; Nakashima S; Yoshikawa S; Watabe M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jan; 98(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 20053027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Victim sensitivity and the accuracy of social judgments.
    Gollwitzer M; Rothmund T; Alt B; Jekel M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Aug; 38(8):975-84. PubMed ID: 22440732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Smith FG; Little AC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):751-8. PubMed ID: 20515201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments.
    Lick DJ; Johnson KL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 110(6):801-17. PubMed ID: 27281352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Beyond categories: Perceiving sexual attraction from faces.
    Bjornsdottir RT; Cheso D; Rule NO
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Feb; 113(1):226-247. PubMed ID: 34296765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two faces of (dis)similarity in affective judgments of persons: contrast or assimilation effects revealed by morphs.
    Ruys KI; Spears R; Gordijn EH; de Vries NK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):399-411. PubMed ID: 16594827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The dual lens model: a comprehensive framework for understanding self-other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance.
    Hirschmüller S; Egloff B; Nestler S; Back MD
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):335-53. PubMed ID: 23046068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.