These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18954228)

  • 1. Changes in cue associability across training in human causal learning.
    Mitchell CJ; Harris JA; Westbrook RF; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Oct; 34(4):423-36. PubMed ID: 18954228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The experimental task influences cue competition in human causal learning.
    Melchers KG; Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):477-83. PubMed ID: 16248733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forward blocking in human learning sometimes reflects the failure to encode a cue-outcome relationship.
    Mitchell CJ; Lovibond PF; Minard E; Lavis Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 May; 59(5):830-44. PubMed ID: 16608749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning.
    Le Pelley ME; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Feb; 56(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 12623538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual control in discrimination reversal learning.
    Ungör M; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Oct; 32(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 17044746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Representational blending in human conditional learning: Implications for associative theory.
    Hodder KI; George DN; Killcross AS; Honey RC
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 May; 56(2):223-38. PubMed ID: 12791571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning.
    Beckers T; De Houwer J; Pineño O; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 15755242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The contribution of spatial cues to memory: direction, but not cue, changes support response reversal learning.
    Wright SL; Williams D; Evans JH; Skinner DM; Martin GM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 19364227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The outcome specificity of learned predictiveness effects: parallels between human causal learning and animal conditioning.
    Le Pelley ME; Oakeshott SM; Wills AJ; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Apr; 31(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 15839778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explaining learned predictiveness: Roles of attention and integration of associative structures.
    Rodríguez G; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 30945925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error.
    Goodie AS; Fantino E
    Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):247-9. PubMed ID: 8637572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit perceptual training: how, when, and why?
    Jackson RC; Farrow D
    Hum Mov Sci; 2005 Jun; 24(3):308-25. PubMed ID: 16087263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The advantage of timely intervention.
    Lagnado DA; Sloman S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):856-76. PubMed ID: 15238029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional bias training and cue reactivity in cigarette smokers.
    Attwood AS; O'Sullivan H; Leonards U; Mackintosh B; Munafò MR
    Addiction; 2008 Nov; 103(11):1875-82. PubMed ID: 19032536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of cue-unique outcome expectations under differential outcomes training: an fMRI study.
    Mok LW; Thomas KM; Lungu OV; Overmier JB
    Brain Res; 2009 Apr; 1265():111-27. PubMed ID: 19401182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal learning with local computations.
    Fernbach PM; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):678-93. PubMed ID: 19379043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning of absolute and relative distance and direction from discrete visual landmarks by pigeons (Columba livia).
    Sturz BR; Katz JS
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Feb; 123(1):90-113. PubMed ID: 19236148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are independent probes truly independent?
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 19586262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interference between cues of the same outcome in a non-causally framed scenario.
    Luque D; Morís J; Cobos PL; López FJ
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):328-32. PubMed ID: 19070656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.