203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18954612)
1. Estimation of the upper limit of the reference value of the QT interval in rest electrocardiograms in healthy young Japanese men using the bootstrap method.
Goto H; Mamorita N; Ikeda N; Miyahara H
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):703.e1-10. PubMed ID: 18954612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 5 methods of QT interval measurements on electrocardiograms from a thorough QT/QTc study: effect on assay sensitivity and categorical outliers.
Salvi V; Karnad DR; Panicker GK; Natekar M; Hingorani P; Kerkar V; Ramasamy A; de Vries M; Zumbrunnen T; Kothari S; Narula D
J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 21238976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two automatic QT algorithms compared with manual measurement in identification of long QT syndrome.
Diamant UB; Winbo A; Stattin EL; Rydberg A; Kesek M; Jensen SM
J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20005993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences between study-specific and subject-specific heart rate corrections of the QT interval in investigations of drug induced QTc prolongation.
Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jun; 27(6 Pt 1):791-800. PubMed ID: 15189536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. T(peak)T(end) interval in long QT syndrome.
Kanters JK; Haarmark C; Vedel-Larsen E; Andersen MP; Graff C; Struijk JJ; Thomsen PE; Christiansen M; Jensen HK; Toft E
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):603-8. PubMed ID: 18822425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of methodological differences in digital electrocardiogram interval measurement.
Badilini F; Sarapa N
J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S152-6. PubMed ID: 16920141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relation of increased short-term variability of QT interval to congenital long-QT syndrome.
Hinterseer M; Beckmann BM; Thomsen MB; Pfeufer A; Dalla Pozza R; Loeff M; Netz H; Steinbeck G; Vos MA; Kääb S
Am J Cardiol; 2009 May; 103(9):1244-8. PubMed ID: 19406266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subject-specific heart rate dependency of electrocardiographic QT, PQ, and QRS intervals.
Malik M; Hnatkova K; Sisakova M; Schmidt G
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):491-7. PubMed ID: 18817925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semiautomated QT interval measurement in electrocardiograms from a thorough QT study: comparison of the grouped and ungrouped superimposed median beat methods.
Hingorani P; Karnad DR; Ramasamy A; Panicker GK; Salvi V; Bhoir H; Kothari S
J Electrocardiol; 2012; 45(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 22364647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An algorithm for QT interval monitoring in neonatal intensive care units.
Helfenbein ED; Ackerman MJ; Rautaharju PM; Zhou SH; Gregg RE; Lindauer JM; Miller D; Wang JJ; Kresge SS; Babaeizadeh S; Feild DQ; Michaud FP
J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(6 Suppl):S103-10. PubMed ID: 17993306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing QT prolongation and electrocardiography restitution using a beat-to-beat method.
Fossa AA; Zhou M
Cardiol J; 2010; 17(3):230-43. PubMed ID: 20535712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. QT interval in normal infants during sleep with concurrent evaluation of QT correction formulae.
Benatar A; Ramet J; Decraene T; Vandenplas Y
Med Sci Monit; 2002 May; 8(5):CR351-6. PubMed ID: 12011777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. QT interval variability and adaptation to heart rate changes in patients with long QT syndrome.
Nemec J; Buncová M; Shusterman V; Winter B; Shen WK; Ackerman MJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 19140916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. QT interval correction in patients with cirrhosis.
Zambruni A; Di Micoli A; Lubisco A; Domenicali M; Trevisani F; Bernardi M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 18(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 17229304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the effect of sotalol on the repolarization intervals in healthy young individuals.
Couderc JP; Zhou M; Sarapa N; Zareba W
J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 18801493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An algorithm for continuous real-time QT interval monitoring.
Helfenbein ED; Zhou SH; Lindauer JM; Field DQ; Gregg RE; Wang JJ; Kresge SS; Michaud FP
J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S123-7. PubMed ID: 16920145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk assessment of R-on-T event based on modeled QT-RR relationship.
Lian J; Muessig D; Lang V
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 Jun; 34(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 21463345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of QT interval adaptation to RR interval changes and its use as a risk-stratifier of arrhythmic mortality in amiodarone-treated survivors of acute myocardial infarction.
Pueyo E; Smetana P; Caminal P; de Luna AB; Malik M; Laguna P
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1511-20. PubMed ID: 15376499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic comparisons of electrocardiographic morphology increase the precision of QT interval measurement.
Hnatkova K; Smetana P; Toman O; Bauer A; Schmidt G; Malik M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 19140922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra- and interreader variability in QT interval measurement by tangent and threshold methods in a central electrocardiogram laboratory.
Panicker GK; Karnad DR; Natekar M; Kothari S; Narula D; Lokhandwala Y
J Electrocardiol; 2009; 42(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 19261293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
