These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18954905)

  • 1. Are accurate witnesses more likely to make absolute judgments?
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Lemieux JM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 31(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 18954905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absolute-judgment models better predict eyewitness decision-making than do relative-judgment models.
    Smith AM; Ying RC; Goldstein AR; Fitzgerald RJ
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 251():105877. PubMed ID: 39002429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying the bad guy in a lineup using confidence judgments under deadline pressure.
    Brewer N; Weber N; Wootton D; Lindsay DS
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22933457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.
    Molinaro PF; Charman SD; Wylie K
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 45(6):524-541. PubMed ID: 34661424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.
    Sauerland M; Sporer SL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: a 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications.
    Dunning D; Perretta S
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Oct; 87(5):951-62. PubMed ID: 12395819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Postidentification feedback affects subsequent eyewitness identification performance.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Dec; 16(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 21198255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lineup administrator influences on eyewitness identification decisions.
    Clark SE; Marshall TE; Rosenthal R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 19309217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency: the unruly 10-12-second rule.
    Weber N; Brewer N; Wells GL; Semmler C; Keast A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Sep; 10(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 15462616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
    Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probative value of absolute and relative judgments in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE; Erickson MA; Breneman J
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):364-80. PubMed ID: 20953683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
    Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy.
    Lindsay RC; Semmler C; Weber N; Brewer N; Lindsay MR
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 18253819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exposure duration: effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence.
    Memon A; Hope L; Bull R
    Br J Psychol; 2003 Aug; 94(Pt 3):339-54. PubMed ID: 14511547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):459-73. PubMed ID: 11688368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: a field study.
    Horry R; Memon A; Wright DB; Milne R
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 22849411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eyewitness recognition errors: the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults.
    Memon A; Hope L; Bartlett J; Bull R
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Dec; 30(8):1219-27. PubMed ID: 12661853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postdictors of eyewitness errors: can false identifications be diagnosed?
    Smith SM; Lindsay RC; Pryke S
    J Appl Psychol; 2000 Aug; 85(4):542-50. PubMed ID: 10948799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.