These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18955065)

  • 1. Duration of courtship effort as a costly signal.
    Seymour RM; Sozou PD
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 18955065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of reproduction on courtship, fertility and longevity within and between alternative male mating tactics of the horned beetle, Onthophagus binodis.
    Simmons LW; Kotiaho JS
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):488-95. PubMed ID: 17305814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why are males bad for females? Models for the evolution of damaging male mating behavior.
    Lessells CM
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S46-63. PubMed ID: 15795861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An asymmetric parental investment conflict with continuous strategy sets.
    Yaniv O
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Dec; 237(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 15975600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time-dependent animal conflicts: 2. The asymmetric case.
    Yaniv O; Motro U
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Jan; 232(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 15530496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2007 Dec; 61(12):2772-89. PubMed ID: 17924955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The cost of reliable signaling: experimental evidence for predictable variation among males in a cost-benefit trade-off between sexually selected traits.
    Murai M; Backwell PR; Jennions MD
    Evolution; 2009 Sep; 63(9):2363-71. PubMed ID: 19453725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategic mating with common preferences.
    Alpern S; Reyniers D
    J Theor Biol; 2005 Dec; 237(4):337-54. PubMed ID: 16171826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of uropygial gland on sexual behavior in domestic chicken Gallus gallus domesticus.
    Hirao A; Aoyama M; Sugita S
    Behav Processes; 2009 Feb; 80(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 19013507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Females are choosier in the dark: environment-dependent reliance on courtship components and its impact on fitness.
    Rundus AS; Sullivan-Beckers L; Wilgers DJ; Hebets EA
    Evolution; 2011 Jan; 65(1):268-82. PubMed ID: 20825477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: game-theoretical and two-locus diploid models.
    Wakano JY; Ihara Y
    Am Nat; 2005 Aug; 166(2):E32-44. PubMed ID: 16032569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Copulation behaviour of Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Muscidae) outside and inside the female, with a discussion of genitalic evolution.
    Briceño RD; Eberhard WG; Robinson AS
    Bull Entomol Res; 2007 Oct; 97(5):471-88. PubMed ID: 17916266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What pair formation can do to the battle of the sexes: towards more realistic game dynamics.
    Mylius SD
    J Theor Biol; 1999 Apr; 197(4):469-85. PubMed ID: 10196090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Costly but worthless gifts facilitate courtship.
    Sozou PD; Seymour RM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Sep; 272(1575):1877-84. PubMed ID: 16191592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolutionary consequences of a trade-off between parental effort and mating effort.
    Dawson KJ
    J Theor Biol; 1996 Nov; 183(2):139-58. PubMed ID: 8977874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation.
    Svensson EI; Karlsson K; Friberg M; Eroukhmanoff F
    Curr Biol; 2007 Nov; 17(22):1943-7. PubMed ID: 17935996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Energy and predation costs of firefly courtship signals.
    Woods WA; Hendrickson H; Mason J; Lewis SM
    Am Nat; 2007 Nov; 170(5):702-8. PubMed ID: 17926292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Female alternative reproductive behaviors: the effect of female group size on mate assessment and copying.
    Brennan BJ; Flaxman SM; Alonzo SH
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Aug; 253(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 18511084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A model for the evolutionary maintenance of monogyny in spiders.
    Fromhage L; McNamara JM; Houston AI
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Feb; 250(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 18045619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.