460 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18955421)
1. A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees.
Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J
Clin Rehabil; 2008; 22(10-11):896-901. PubMed ID: 18955421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative evaluation of oxygen consumption and gait pattern in amputees using Intelligent Prostheses and conventionally damped knee swing-phase control.
Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J
Clin Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 19(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 15929508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet.
Torburn L; Powers CM; Guiterrez R; Perry J
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 May; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 7562650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Energy costs and performance of transfemoral amputees and non-amputees during walking and running: A pilot study.
Mengelkoch LJ; Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Oct; 41(5):484-491. PubMed ID: 27885098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Energy expenditure of transfemoral amputees walking on a horizontal and tilted treadmill simulating different outdoor walking conditions.
Starholm IM; Gjovaag T; Mengshoel AM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Jun; 34(2):184-94. PubMed ID: 20141493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet.
Ehara Y; Beppu M; Nomura S; Kunimi Y; Takahashi S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Jan; 74(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 8420524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of prosthetic foot roll-over shape arc length on the gait of trans-tibial prosthesis users.
Hansen AH; Meier MR; Sessoms PH; Childress DS
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2006 Dec; 30(3):286-99. PubMed ID: 17162519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of aerobic capacity and walking economy of unilateral transfemoral amputees.
Gjovaag T; Starholm IM; Mirtaheri P; Hegge FW; Skjetne K
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Apr; 38(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 23798044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The energy cost for the step-to-step transition in amputee walking.
Houdijk H; Pollmann E; Groenewold M; Wiggerts H; Polomski W
Gait Posture; 2009 Jul; 30(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 19321343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of an Intelligent Prosthesis (IP) on the walking ability of young transfemoral amputees: comparison of IP users with able-bodied people.
Chin T; Sawamura S; Shiba R; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Takase I; Machida K; Nakagawa A
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 82(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 12820787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energy expenditure in people with transtibial amputation walking with crossover and energy storing prosthetic feet: A randomized within-subject study.
McDonald CL; Kramer PA; Morgan SJ; Halsne EG; Cheever SM; Hafner BJ
Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():349-354. PubMed ID: 29614468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations.
Powers CM; Torburn L; Perry J; Ayyappa E
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 Jul; 75(7):825-9. PubMed ID: 8024435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Energy cost during ambulation in transfemoral amputees: a knee joint with a mechanical swing phase control vs a knee joint with a pneumatic swing phase control.
Boonstra AM; Schrama J; Fidler V; Eisma WH
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1995 Jun; 27(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 7569824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional gait asymmetry of unilateral transfemoral amputees.
Schaarschmidt M; Lipfert SW; Meier-Gratz C; Scholle HC; Seyfarth A
Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Aug; 31(4):907-17. PubMed ID: 22248566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maximum Swing Flexion or Gait Symmetry: A Comparative Evaluation of Control Targets on Metabolic Energy Expenditure of Amputee Using Intelligent Prosthetic Knee.
Cao W; Zhao W; Yu H; Chen W; Meng Q
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():2898546. PubMed ID: 30584532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uphill and downhill walking in unilateral lower limb amputees.
Vrieling AH; van Keeken HG; Schoppen T; Otten E; Halbertsma JP; Hof AL; Postema K
Gait Posture; 2008 Aug; 28(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 18242995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of prosthetic ankle energy storage and return properties on muscle activity in below-knee amputee walking.
Ventura JD; Klute GK; Neptune RR
Gait Posture; 2011 Feb; 33(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 21145747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does having a computerized prosthetic knee influence cognitive performance during amputee walking?
Williams RM; Turner AP; Orendurff M; Segal AD; Klute GK; Pecoraro J; Czerniecki J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):989-94. PubMed ID: 16813788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variability of kinetic variables during gait in unilateral transtibial amputees.
Svoboda Z; Janura M; Cabell L; Elfmark M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Jun; 36(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 22440580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
