135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18956145)
1. Patient dose evaluation by means of DICOM images for a direct radiography system.
Rampado O; Garelli E; Zatteri R; Escoffier U; De Lucchi R; Ropolo R
Radiol Med; 2008 Dec; 113(8):1219-28. PubMed ID: 18956145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of entrance surface air kerma due to diagnostic X-ray examinations of adult patients in Uttarakhand, India and establishment of local diagnostic reference levels.
Uniyal SC; Chaturvedi V; Sharma SD; Raghuvanshi S
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Sep; 40(3):687-694. PubMed ID: 28819817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool.
Brady SL; Kaufman RA
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2489-97. PubMed ID: 25979042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 30289498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimates of Patient Radiation Doses in Digital Radiography Using DICOM Information at a Large Teaching Hospital in Oman.
Suliman II
J Digit Imaging; 2020 Feb; 33(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 30891650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DETERMINATION OF DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVEL IN ROUTINE EXAMINATIONS OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN MAZANDARAN PROVINCE.
Hoseini Motlagh Z; Shabestani Monfared A; Deevband MR; Abedi-Firouzjah R; Ghaemian N; Abdi R; Ebrahimnejad Gorji K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 32491180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An approach for the online determination of Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK) from Kerma Area product (P
Suliman II
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 45(4):1055-1061. PubMed ID: 36107385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dose management for X-ray and CT: systematic comparison of exposition values from two institutes to diagnostic reference levels and use of results for optimisation of exposition.
Schäfer S; Alejandre-Lafont E; Schmidt T; Gizewski ER; Fiebich M; Krombach GA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):785-94. PubMed ID: 24691838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis.
Sabol JM
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5480-7. PubMed ID: 20095260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Entrance surface air kerma to patients during digital radiographic examinations in Tanzania.
Makoba A; Jusabani A; Muhogora W; Kileo A; Ndukeki M; Makungu H; Maro H; Onoka E; Ngulimi M; Mammba H; Muhulo A; Masoud A; Balobegwa V; Ngoye W; Nakembetwa A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Mar; 200(3):229-239. PubMed ID: 38069535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective patient dose analysis of Ghana's first direct digital radiography system.
Inkoom S; Togobo J; Emi-Reynolds G; Oddoye A; Ntiri TO; Gyekye PK
Health Phys; 2012 Aug; 103(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 22739831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient dose in digital mammography.
Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology procedures in Montenegro.
Milatović A; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Ivanović S; Jovanović S; Spasić-Jokić V
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):454-63. PubMed ID: 21775317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective patient dose analysis of a digital radiography system in routine clinical use.
Schuncke A; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 15933094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ESTIMATES OF PATIENT DOSES AND KERMA-AREA PRODUCT MONITORING IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
Kaushik C; Sandhu IS; Srivastava AK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Aug; 190(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 32491168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of patient doses for routine digital radiography procedures toward establishing an institutional diagnostic reference levels: A case study in Sri Lanka.
Welarathna S; Velautham S; Wanninayake M; Sarasanandarajah S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13852. PubMed ID: 36448529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient dose and image quality in five standard x-ray examinations.
Havukainen R; Pirinen M
Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 8350841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of adult patient doses in film screen and computed radiography in some Sudanese hospitals.
Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):402-5. PubMed ID: 25889604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
