These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18956277)

  • 21. Antepartum non stress cardiotocography and quantified short term variability of foetal heart rate in high-risk pregnancies.
    Ammälä P
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1983; 72(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 6666997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer analysis of foetal monitoring signals.
    Nunes I; Ayres-de-Campos D
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Jan; 30():68-78. PubMed ID: 26211832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Inter-observer agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN.
    Vayssière C; Tsatsaris V; Pirrello O; Cristini C; Arnaud C; Goffinet F
    BJOG; 2009 Jul; 116(8):1081-7; discussion 1087-8. PubMed ID: 19515149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How often is a low 5-min Apgar score in term newborns due to asphyxia?
    Hogan L; Ingemarsson I; Thorngren-Jerneck K; Herbst A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Feb; 130(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 16621222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. ["Quantitative cardiotocography"--clinical practice guideline].
    Ignatov P; Atanasov B
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2011; 50(6):3-9. PubMed ID: 22452059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Intrapartum foetal monitoring: from stethoscope to ST analysis of the ECG].
    Westerhuis ME; Strasser SM; Moons KG; Mol BW; Visser GH; Kwee A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():B259. PubMed ID: 19785820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of neonatal outcome artery pH value according to CTG interpretation of the last 60 min before delivery: a retrospective study. Can the outcome pH value be predicted?
    Kundu S; Kuehnle E; Schippert C; von Ehr J; Hillemanns P; Staboulidou I
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Nov; 296(5):897-905. PubMed ID: 28879450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The fetal ECG--ST analysis in the diagnosis of fetal hypoxia].
    Hájek Z; Vráblik J; Haddad R; Kratochvíl B; Parízek A
    Ceska Gynekol; 2002 Apr; 67 Suppl 1():16-9. PubMed ID: 12061165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. SisPorto 4.0 - computer analysis following the 2015 FIGO Guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Ayres-de-Campos D; Rei M; Nunes I; Sousa P; Bernardes J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jan; 30(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 26940372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison between visual and computerized cardiotocography in low risk pregnancy.
    Mirghani HM; Khair H
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Aug; 26(8):1228-30. PubMed ID: 16127519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [On-line evaluation of the cardiotocogram using computer technology].
    Petránek J; Cejka M; Kravka A; Kittrich D
    Cesk Gynekol; 1990 Dec; 55(10):721-31. PubMed ID: 2285936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prognostic decision support using symbolic dynamics in CTG monitoring.
    Cesarelli M; Romano M; Bifulco P; Improta G; D'Addio G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 186():140-4. PubMed ID: 23542985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [A comparative study of the prognostic pH values of the fetus in utero, generated by the "quantitative cardiotocography" computer method, and the actual pH values measured immediately after delivery].
    Ignatov P; Atanasov B; Kostov I; Velev R; Kovacheva A; Dobreva A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010; 49(4):3-11. PubMed ID: 20734634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Twenty-four-hour CTG monitoring: comparison of normal pregnancies of 25-30 weeks of gestation versus 36-42 weeks of gestation.
    Kühnert M; Hellmeyer L; Stein W; Schmidt S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Jun; 275(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 17119988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. eCTG: an automatic procedure to extract digital cardiotocographic signals from digital images.
    Sbrollini A; Agostinelli A; Marcantoni I; Morettini M; Burattini L; Di Nardo F; Fioretti S; Burattini L
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():133-139. PubMed ID: 29428065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Use of CTG during pregnancy and childbirth].
    Schneider KT; Butterwegge M; Daumer M; Dudenhausen J; Feige A; Gonser M; Hecher K; Jensen A; Koepcke E; Künzel W; Roemer VM; Schmidt S; Vetter K
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2006 Apr; 210(2):38-49. PubMed ID: 16565938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictive accuracy of intrapartum cardiotocography in terms of fetal acid base status at birth.
    Tasnim N; Mahmud G; Akram S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Oct; 19(10):632-5. PubMed ID: 19811714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Fetal heart rate variation in magnetocardiography and cardiotocography--a direct comparison of the two methods].
    Schiermeier S; van Leeuwen P; Lange S; Geue D; Daumer M; Reinhard J; Grönemeyer D; Hatzmann W
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2007 Oct; 211(5):179-84. PubMed ID: 17960515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Quantitative cardiotocography].
    Atanasov B; Ignatov P
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2008; 47(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 18642579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Antepartum cardiotocography: a study of fetal reactivity in frequency domain.
    Romano M; Bracale M; Cesarelli M; Campanile M; Bifulco P; De Falco M; Sansone M; Di Lieto A
    Comput Biol Med; 2006 Jun; 36(6):619-33. PubMed ID: 16005863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.