262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18956595)
1. MRCP vs. ERCP in the evaluation of biliary pathologies: review of current literature.
Hekimoglu K; Ustundag Y; Dusak A; Erdem Z; Karademir B; Aydemir S; Gundogdu S
J Dig Dis; 2008 Aug; 9(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 18956595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pancreaticobiliary diseases. Comparison of 2D single-shot turbo spin-echo MR cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Arslan A; Geitung JT; Viktil E; Abdelnoor M; Osnes M
Acta Radiol; 2000 Nov; 41(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 11092486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
Dillman JR; Patel RM; Lin TK; Towbin AJ; Trout AT
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2377-2383. PubMed ID: 30874847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.
Polistina FA; Frego M; Bisello M; Manzi E; Vardanega A; Perin B
World J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 7(4):70-8. PubMed ID: 25918584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree.
Taylor AC; Little AF; Hennessy OF; Banting SW; Smith PJ; Desmond PV
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jan; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11756908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Hintze RE; Adler A; Veltzke W; Abou-Rebyeh H; Hammerstingl R; Vogl T; Felix R
Endoscopy; 1997 Mar; 29(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 9201467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR cholangiopancreatography with T2-weighted prospective acquisition correction turbo spin-echo sequence of the biliary anatomy of potential living liver transplant donors.
Basaran C; Agildere AM; Donmez FY; Sevmis S; Budakoglu I; Karakayali H; Haberal M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 18492903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of magnetic-resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic-retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP).
Adamek HE; Weitz M; Breer H; Jakobs R; Schilling D; Riemann JF
Endoscopy; 1997 Oct; 29(8):741-4. PubMed ID: 9427493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The decision-making value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients suspicious for pancreatobiliary diseases].
Chang YJ; Kim JS; Kim HS; Kim MG; Lee JY; Seo YS; Kim CH; Kim JY; Yeon JE; Park JJ; Byun KS; Bak YT; Lee CH
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2006 Apr; 47(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 16632983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of MRCP and ERCP in the evaluation of common bile duct and pancreatic duct pathologies.
Kumar A; Mohanty NR; Mohanty M; Dash S
Front Med Technol; 2023; 5():946555. PubMed ID: 37521722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR cholangiopancreatography at 0.5 T with a 3D inversion recovery turbo-spin-echo sequence.
Chrysikopoulos H; Papanikolaou N; Pappas J; Roussakis A; Andreou J
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(8):1318-22. PubMed ID: 9377521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.
Fulcher AS; Turner MA; Capps GW; Zfass AM; Baker KM
Radiology; 1998 Apr; 207(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 9530295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Better non-invasive endoscopic procedure: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
Mesihović R; Mehmedović A
Med Glas (Zenica); 2019 Feb; 16(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 30256060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between MRCP and ERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital.
Rahman R; Ju J; Shamma's J; Goebel S; Sundaram U
W V Med J; 2010; 106(5):14-9. PubMed ID: 21739880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.
Ainsworth AP; Rafaelsen SR; Wamberg PA; Pless T; Durup J; Mortensen MB
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 39(6):579-83. PubMed ID: 15223684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: a prospective comparative study.
Scaffidi MG; Luigiano C; Consolo P; Pellicano R; Giacobbe G; Gaeta M; Blandino A; Familiari L
Minerva Med; 2009 Oct; 100(5):341-8. PubMed ID: 19910887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
