198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18956703)
21. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization].
Xiao YP; Tao X; Zhao CY; Qu YQ; Xie F; Ning Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Residual lesions in uterine specimens after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with CIN.
Jing L; Dan W; Zhunan L; Ying X; Yi C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):805-812. PubMed ID: 30167855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Motomatsu S; Konno R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervical margins.
Ayhan A; Boynukalin FK; Guven S; Dogan NU; Esinler I; Usubutun A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Apr; 105(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 19111301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Evaluation of cold knife conization (CKC) on diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Zhang X; Li L; Zhang WH; Li SM
Ai Zheng; 2003 Sep; 22(9):994-6. PubMed ID: 12969537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization.
Wang X; Xu J; Gao Y; Qu P
BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):191. PubMed ID: 33962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Conization using electrosurgical conization and cold coagulation for international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IA1 squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
Lee SJ; Kim WY; Lee JW; Kim HS; Choi YL; Ahn GH; Lee JH; Kim BG; Bae DS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Apr; 19(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 19407568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tumor persistence in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive surgical margin post loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Sankasem A; Thavaramara T; Manusirivithaya S; Tangjitgamol S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jul; 89(7):934-40. PubMed ID: 16881423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as a predictor of the risk of recurrent disease-a 16-year follow-up study.
Alder S; Megyessi D; Sundström K; Östensson E; Mints M; Belkić K; Arbyn M; Andersson S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):172.e1-172.e12. PubMed ID: 31473226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Management of Early Cervical Stromal Invasion FIGO Stage 1A1 When Margins Are Involved With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Nicholson RC; Twigg J; Roberts A; Angelopoulos G; Cruickshank D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2018 Apr; 22(2):129-131. PubMed ID: 29474238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Efficacy of complications of different surgical treatments in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III].
Zeng SY; Liang MR; Li LY; Wu YY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 20003783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Repeat surgery in patients with cervical cancer stage FIGO IA1: a series of 156 cases and a review of the literature.
Hefler LA; Polterauer S; Schneitter A; Concin N; Hofstetter G; Bentz E; Leipold H; Tempfer C; Reinthaller A
Anticancer Res; 2010 Feb; 30(2):565-8. PubMed ID: 20332471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Pathologic risk factors for predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP conization.
Kim HJ; Kim KR; Mok JE; Nam JH; Kim YT; Kim YM; Kim JH; Yun SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 May; 105(2):434-8. PubMed ID: 17303228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
Shaco-Levy R; Eger G; Dreiher J; Benharroch D; Meirovitz M
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Jan; 33(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24300540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
