198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18956703)
61. Long-term outcomes of a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a high incidence country.
Sangkarat S; Ruengkhachorn I; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongthiraporn W; Rattanachaiyanont M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(2):1035-9. PubMed ID: 24568447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Recurrence rate after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) and laser Conization: A 5-year follow-up study.
Bogani G; DI Donato V; Sopracordevole F; Ciavattini A; Ghelardi A; Lopez S; Simoncini T; Plotti F; Casarin J; Serati M; Pinelli C; Valenti G; Bergamini A; Gardella B; Dell'acqua A; Monti E; Vercellini P; Fischetti M; D'Ippolito G; Aguzzoli L; Mandato VD; Carunchio P; Carlinfante G; Giannella L; Scaffa C; Falcone F; Borghi C; Ditto A; Malzoni M; Giannini A; Salerno MG; Liberale V; Contino B; Donfrancesco C; Desiato M; Perrone AM; Dondi G; De Iaco P; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Signorelli M; Chiappa V; Ferrero S; Sarpietro G; Matarazzo MG; Cianci A; Bosio S; Ruisi S; Guerrisi R; Brusadelli C; Mosca L; Tinelli R; DE Vincenzo R; Zannoni GF; Ferrandina G; Petrillo M; Dessole S; Angioli R; Greggi S; Spinillo A; Ghezzi F; Colacurci N; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):636-641. PubMed ID: 32893030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Post-conization follow-up of patients with CIN 2/3 with different amount of distance to negative cone biopsy margin: a retrospective cohort study.
Giray B; Kabaca-Kocakusak C; Guray-Uzun M; Akis S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 40(3):406-410. PubMed ID: 31455147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Surgical management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected women.
Foulot H; Heard I; Potard V; Costagliola D; Chapron C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Dec; 141(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 18760524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Value of endocervical margin and high-risk human papillomavirus status after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma in situ, and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Kong TW; Son JH; Chang SJ; Paek J; Lee Y; Ryu HS
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25284039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease.
Tyler LN; Andrews N; Parrish RS; Hazlett LJ; Korourian S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Apr; 131(4):622-4. PubMed ID: 17425396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Laser conization: the results of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Andersen ES; Pedersen B; Nielsen K
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 8063246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Kwok ST; Chan KKL; Tse KY; Chu MMY; Lau LSK; Ngan HYS; Ngu SF
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 36720549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Residual and recurrent lesions after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Milojkovic M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2002 Jan; 76(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11818094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Increase in the cervical length after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Akashi K; Suzuki Y; Konno R; Motomatsu S
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 27924675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. [Diagnosis and treatment of grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by cervical conization in 98 patients].
Chen W; Guan T
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1642-4, 1647. PubMed ID: 20650790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Value of second pass in loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Kim K; Kang SB; Chung HH; Lee TS; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
J Korean Med Sci; 2009 Feb; 24(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 19270822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Risk Factors for Persistence or Recurrence of High-Grade Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.
Bittencourt DD; Zanine RM; Sebastião APM; Ribas CM
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2023; 50():e20233537. PubMed ID: 38055549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Unique recurrence patterns of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after excision of the squamocolumnar junction.
Herfs M; Somja J; Howitt BE; Suarez-Carmona M; Kustermans G; Hubert P; Doyen J; Goffin F; Kridelka F; Crum CP; Delvenne P
Int J Cancer; 2015 Mar; 136(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 24839092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Excisional treatment comparison for in situ endocervical adenocarcinoma (EXCISE): A phase 2 pilot randomized controlled trial to compare histopathological margin status, specimen size and fragmentation after loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife cone biopsy.
Cohen PA; Leung Y; Anderson L; van der Griend R; Chivers P; Bilic S; Bittinger S; Brand A; Bulsara MK; Codde J; Eva L; Farrell L; Harker D; Herbst U; Jeffares S; Loh D; McNally O; Mohan GR; Nicholson T; Powell A; Salfinger SG; Simcock B; Stewart C; Silvers J; Stockler MR; Sykes P; Stoyles P; Tan A; Tan AL; Wrede CDH
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 159(3):623-629. PubMed ID: 33032824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
