199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18956703)
81. [Evaluation of the recurrence and residual lesions incidence after loop electroexcisional procedure and cold knife conisation].
Kabzińska-Turek M; Basta A; Stangel-Wójcikiewicz K; Knafel A; Zajac K; Przybylska-Jurecka P; Jach R; Milewicz T
Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(9):658-62. PubMed ID: 23401984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Low recurrence rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful excision and routine colposcopy during follow-up.
Lili E; Chatzistamatiou K; Kalpaktsidou-Vakiani A; Moysiadis T; Agorastos T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(4):e9719. PubMed ID: 29369205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Huang LW; Hwang JL
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10094873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III.
Lu CH; Liu FS; Kuo CJ; Chang CC; Ho ES
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):830-5. PubMed ID: 16582119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Conization using the Shimodaira-Taniguchi procedure for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Hiramatsu K; Ueda Y; Yoshino K; Fujita M; Morii E; Enomoto T; Kimura T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jun; 168(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 23395556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years.
Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. [Loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a valuable method for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Fan Q; Tay SK; Shen K
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 May; 36(5):271-4. PubMed ID: 11783374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Clinical predictors of residual disease in hysterectomy following a loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Wu Q; Jiang Y; Ding J; Xia L; Xu H
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Dec; 22(1):971. PubMed ID: 36575366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. [Value of endocervical margin examination of conization specimens. Prospective study conducted on 150 patients].
Rojat-Habib MC; Cravello L; Bretelle F; Roger V; Liprandi A; de Burtel I; d'Ercole C; Pellissier JF; Blanc B
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000; 28(7-8):518-25. PubMed ID: 10996963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
Wang XI; Huang F; Zhang S
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2017 Nov; 47(6):663-667. PubMed ID: 29263039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Long-term outcomes of photodynamic therapy for a positive resection margin after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Kim M; Choi MC; Lee C; Na YJ; Kim SJ
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Mar; 37():102639. PubMed ID: 34823035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management.
Chen Y; Lu H; Wan X; Lv W; Xie X
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 107(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 19628208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. An electrical scalpel conization versus Shimodaira-Taniguchi conization procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Kigure K; Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Nakao K; Hirakawa T; Rokukawa S; Ito M; Nishimura T; Ito I; Kagami I; Itoga S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12640. PubMed ID: 30313051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Frozen section examination of the endocervical margin of cervical conization specimens.
Rouzier R; Feyereisen E; Constancis E; Haddad B; Dubois P; Paniel BJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 12893191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Predictors of high-grade residual disease after repeat conization in patients with positive surgical margins.
Minareci Y; Ak N; Tosun OA; Sozen H; Disci R; Topuz S; Salihoglu MY
Ginekol Pol; 2022; 93(12):962-967. PubMed ID: 35894500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Cytological follow-up of women older than 50 years with high-grade cervical smear treated by large loop excision.
Das N; Sutton V; Bevan J; Brinkmann D; Woolas R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jul; 13(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 19550214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Value of human papillomavirus testing after conization by loop electrosurgical excision for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Houfflin Debarge V; Collinet P; Vinatier D; Ego A; Dewilde A; Boman F; Leroy JL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Sep; 90(3):587-92. PubMed ID: 13678729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
Durmuş Y; Karalök A; Başaran D; Kamani MO; Boran N; Koç S; Turan AT
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. The role of endocervical curettage in detection and treatment of cervical canal lesions.
Lang L; Jia Y; Duan Z; Wu J; Luo M; Tian P
Histol Histopathol; 2022 Jan; 37(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 34755328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Prediction of residual/recurrent disease by HPV genotype after loop excision procedure for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with negative margins.
Wu D; Zheng Y; Chen W; Guo C; Yu J; Chen G; Huang Y
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Apr; 51(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 21466511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
