These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1895763)
1. Remarks on the judge's role and moral certainty. Kessler G Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):34-6. PubMed ID: 1895763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond the black letter of the law: an empirical study of an individual judge's decision process for civil commitment hearings. Bursztajn HJ; Hamm RM; Gutheil TG J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 9148885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill. Neff RC Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Judicial decisions in civil commitment: facts, attitudes, and psychiatric recommendations. Hiday VA Law Soc Rev; 1983; 17(3):517-30. PubMed ID: 11658694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A judge's perspective: the New York rulings. Wachtler S Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):60-2. PubMed ID: 1895766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal conceptualizations, legal fictions, and the manipulation of reality: conflict between models of decision making in psychiatry and law. Gutheil TG; Mills MJ Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 6128038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal issues in determining competence to make treatment decisions. Benesch K New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1989; No. 41():97-105. PubMed ID: 11659187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the right to autonomy be resuscitated after Glucksberg? Safranek JP; Safranek SJ Univ Colo Law Rev; 1998; 69(3):731-57. PubMed ID: 16086508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The case of Mr. Stevens. Cranford RE Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 1938335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal control of psychosurgery. Katz BF Med Trial Tech Q; 1975; 21(4):407-43. PubMed ID: 1152634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Queensland's Mental Health Court: the first 12 months. Lawrence JM Health Law Can; 2004 Apr; 24(3):47-59. PubMed ID: 15192939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future. Wallach S Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The psychiatric duty to warn: walking a tightrope of uncertainty. McClarren GM Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1987; 56(1):269-93. PubMed ID: 11658955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications. Parry JW Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In the matter of Mary Hier. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Consequences of involuntary treatment. Hassenfeld IN Am J Psychiatry; 1998 Mar; 155(3):450-1. PubMed ID: 9501768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to die. Powell JA; Cohen AS Issues Law Med; 1994; 10(2):169-82. PubMed ID: 7960664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Right to die (second of two parts): a set of fact sheets. Society for the Right to Die Conn Med; 1982 May; 46(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 11643762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Can a patient refuse a psychiatric consultation to evaluate decision-making capacity? Wenger NS; Halpern J J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 7841473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical issues in the representation of individuals in the commitment process. Perlin ML; Sadoff RL Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):161-92. PubMed ID: 11645494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]