186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1895766)
1. A judge's perspective: the New York rulings.
Wachtler S
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):60-2. PubMed ID: 1895766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Cruzan v Harmon, and In the Matter of O'Connor. Two anomalies.
Gasner MR
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):594-9. PubMed ID: 2332578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruzan: facing the inevitable.
Bopp J; Marzen TJ
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):37-51. PubMed ID: 1910130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan and the demands of due process.
Haddad ME
Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 1399496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.
Albert LA
J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legalistic ethics and the lingering doubt about withdrawing life-supports.
Vaux K
J Allied Health; 1991; 20(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 1761409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Doe v. Wilson.
Salyer DR
Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):319-20. PubMed ID: 2279920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New York rule compounds dilemma over life support.
Belkin L
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A1, B4. PubMed ID: 11646928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Persistent vegetative state and the right to die: the United States and Britain.
Jennett B; Dyer C
BMJ; 1991 May; 302(6787):1256-8. PubMed ID: 2043853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. From medicalization to legalization to politicization: O'Connor, Cruzan, and refusal of treatment in the 1990s.
Johnson SH
Conn Law Rev; 1989; 21(3):685-722. PubMed ID: 11650431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case.
Obade CC
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cruzan: it's not over, Nancy?
Shuster E
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 2132018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate.
Tecklenburg N
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Living wills in New York: are they valid?
Vile SE
Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Linares affair.
Lantos JD; Miles SH; Cassel CK
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 2628645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Surrogate decisions at risk. The Cruzan case.
Thomasma DC
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):603-4. PubMed ID: 2110204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Death, privacy, and the free exercise of religion.
Stacy T
Cornell Law Rev; 1992 Mar; 77(3):490-595. PubMed ID: 10117969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Living wills and the right to die.
Wallach SJ; Crabtree JP
Hawaii Med J; 1990 Dec; 49(12):461-4. PubMed ID: 2286520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
