186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1895766)
21. What actually happened: an informed review of the Linares incident.
Goldman GM; Stratton KM; Brown MD
Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 2628644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Evolving Delaware law on the termination of life-sustaining treatment.
Hayman S
Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):205-8, 213-4. PubMed ID: 3569614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. New York's highest court rejects family's plea in right-to-die case.
Shipp ER
N Y Times Web; 1988 Oct; ():1, 36. PubMed ID: 11646705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Precatory prediction and mindless mimicry: the case of Mary O'Connor.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988 Dec; 18(6):31-3. PubMed ID: 3147972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. When is medical treatment "futile"?
Bennett AJ
Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 8354625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of the courts in terminating life-sustaining medical treatment.
Leibson CM
Issues Law Med; 1995; 10(4):437-51. PubMed ID: 7737849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The insane root takes reason prisoner.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 2497081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Termination of life-sustaining medical treatment: who should exercise a patient's right to die?
Denbo SM
Health Care Superv; 1994 Jun; 12(4):60-72. PubMed ID: 10134143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Medical ethics in the courtroom: the need for scrutiny.
Pellegrino ED; Sharpe VA
Perspect Biol Med; 1989; 32(4):547-64. PubMed ID: 2674888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Where is the sure interpreter?
Capron AM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(4):26-7. PubMed ID: 1387120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):95-162. PubMed ID: 11649886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Equality for the elderly incompetent: a proposal for dignified death.
Merritt TL
Stanford Law Rev; 1987 Feb; 39(3):689-736. PubMed ID: 10281165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. In re Smerdon.
Kraayeveld J
Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 1765455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Physician-assisted suicide and the right to die with assistance.
Harv Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 105(8):2021-40. PubMed ID: 10119163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Artificial feeding and the right to die. The legal issues.
Snyder L
J Leg Med; 1988 Sep; 9(3):349-75. PubMed ID: 3147314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The right of the elderly to self-determination and New York's legislative imperative.
Tomlinson AK
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):63-113. PubMed ID: 11650172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Terminating life support for mentally retarded, critically ill patients: the prosecutor's perspective.
Nesbitt JB
J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):245-65. PubMed ID: 6981678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing.
Koop CE; Grant ER
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The living will: does it protect the rights of the terminally ill?
Rizzo RF
N Y State J Med; 1989 Feb; 89(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 2710437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The insane root takes reason prisoner: the supreme court and the right to die.
Annas GJ
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 8453236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
